Dunlap v. TM Trucking of the Carolinas, LLC
Decision Date | 12 December 2017 |
Docket Number | Civil Action No. 0:15–cv–04009–JMC |
Parties | Rodney R. DUNLAP; Kevin Good; Bernard Elam; Joe Neal; Mack Thompson, Plaintiffs, v. TM TRUCKING OF THE CAROLINAS, LLC, TNT Trucking of the Carolinas, Inc., T–N–T Trucking of York County, Inc., TNT Propane, Inc., and Tony McMillan, individually, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina |
Jeremy Randall Summerlin, W. Andrew Arnold, Horton Law Firm, Greenville, SC, Jenny L. Sharpe, Sharpe Law Office, Charlotte, NC, for Plaintiffs.
Joseph Daniel Dickey, Jr., Dickey Law Group, Columbia, SC, Leah B. Moody, Leah B. Moody Law Office, Rock Hill, SC, for Defendants.
Plaintiffs Rodney R. Dunlap, Kevin Good, Bernard Elam, Joe Neal and Mack Thompson (collectively "Plaintiffs") filed this civil rights action against Defendants TM Trucking of the Carolinas, LLC, TNT Trucking of the Carolinas, Inc., T–N–T Trucking of York County, Inc., TNT Propane, Inc. and Tony McMillan ("McMillan") (collectively "Defendants") pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 alleging claims for hostile work environment and constructive discharge. (ECF No. 1 at 14 ¶¶ 80–83.)
This matter is before the court on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 (ECF No. 70.) Specifically, Defendants assert that "there is no genuine issue of material fact and that they are entitled to summary judgment on each Plaintiffs' claim." (Id. at 1.) In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2)(g) (D.S.C.), the matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges for pretrial handling. On August 24, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 78) recommending that "Defendants motion be granted as to Plaintiffs' constructive discharge claim and denied as to Plaintiffs' claims for hostile work environment." (Id. at 14.) Both Plaintiffs and Defendants filed Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which Objections are presently before the court. (ECF Nos. 80 & 81.) For the reasons set forth below, the court ACCEPTS IN PART the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' claim for hostile work environment and DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to the claim of Plaintiffs Dunlap, Good and Neal for constructive discharge.
Defendants TM Trucking of the Carolinas, LLC,2 TNT Trucking of the Carolinas, Inc.,3 T–N–T Trucking of York County, Inc.,4 TNT Propane, Inc.5 (collectively "Corporate Defendants") are all engaged in the business of transporting/hauling goods. (ECF No. 74–1 at 20:22–21:5.) Corporate Defendants are all physically located at 605 Albright Road in Rock Hill, South Carolina. (Id. at 19:9–23.) McMillan is the one hundred per cent owner of Corporate Defendants. (Id. at 18:3–23.) McMillan possesses ultimate hiring and firing authority as to Corporate Defendants. (Id. at 32:4–15 & 73:10–74:5.) McMillan is the only individual with check writing authority for Corporate Defendants. (Id. at 28:3–10.) McMillan is the individual responsible for "implementing the human resources functions" and for ensuring that Corporate Defendants are "compliant with federal and state equal employment opportunity laws." (Id. at 32:25–33:8.) Additionally, McMillan is responsible for dispatching trucks and assigning their drivers. (Id. at 34:12–20.)
Plaintiff Dunlap drove a dump truck for Defendants T–N–T Trucking of York County, Inc. and/or TNT Trucking of the Carolinas, Inc. (together the "TNT Defendants") from June 21, 2013, through January 25, 2014. (ECF No. 71–1 at 5:20:6, 11:44:9–24 & 19:76:16–21; ECF No. 74–1 at 58:14–17.) Plaintiff Neal was employed as a dump truck driver by TNT Defendants from May 29, 2012, through May 10, 2013. (ECF No. 71–4 at 7:27:21–28:17 & 8:31:22–23; ECF No. 74–1 at 62:10–19 & 63:24–65:11; ECF No. 74–5 at 4:22–23.) Plaintiff Good worked for TNT Defendants as a dump truck driver from August 15, 2012, to February 4, 2014. (ECF No. 71–3 at 9:33:8–20, 11:44:11–16 & 14:54:18–25; ECF No. 74–1 at 68:6–11.) Plaintiff Elam was employed as both a long haul driver and dump truck driver for TNT Defendants from September 16, 2010, until December 13, 2013. (ECF No. 71–2 at 9:36:19–10:37:11; ECF No. 74–1 at 69:8–70:12 & 72:1–3; ECF No. 74–3 at 8:13–15.) Finally, Plaintiff Thompson worked as a driver for TM Trucking of the Carolinas, LLC on six (6) separate occasions, the last period lasting from January 9, 2012 to March 2014. (ECF No. 71–5 at 6:22:9–14 & 8:30:6–13; ECF No. 74–1 at 77:5–8.)
During their employment, Plaintiffs assert that McMillan used the term "nigger" in the work environment thereby subjecting Plaintiffs to a racially-hostile and abusive working environment and causing the constructive discharge of Dunlap, Good, Elam and Neal. The following is a comprehensive summation of Plaintiffs' allegations:
To continue reading
Request your trial- Acosta v. Democratic City Comm.
-
Rhodes v. Sterling, C/A No. 5:19-cv-03231-SAL
...attention on those issues—factual and legal—that are at the heart of the parties’ dispute.’ " Dunlap v. TM Trucking of the Carolinas, LLC , 288 F.Supp.3d 654, 662 n.6 (D.S.C. Dec. 12, 2017) (citation omitted). A specific objection "requires more than a reassertion of arguments from the [ple......
-
Davis v. Phelps
... ... conclusory' objections have been made[.]” ... Dunlap v. TM Trucking of the Carolinas, LLC, 288 ... F.Supp.3d 654, 662 (D.S.C. 2017). “An ... ...
-
Smith v. Dobbs
...those portions to which only ‘general and conclusory' objections have been made[.]” Dunlap v. TM Trucking of the Carolinas, LLC, 288 F.Supp.3d 654, 662 (D.S.C. 2017). “An objection is specific if it ‘enables the district judge to focus attention on those issues-factual and legal-that are at......