Dunn v. Board of Assessors of Sterling

Decision Date27 April 1972
Citation282 N.E.2d 385,361 Mass. 692
PartiesGary F. DUNN v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS OF STERLING.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Thomas J. Donahue, Jr., Worcester, for respondent.

Before TAURO, C.J., and SPIEGEL, REARDON and BRAUCHER, JJ.

TAURO, Chief Justice.

The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus ordering the board of assessors of the town of Sterling to make available for the petitioner's examination field record cards which a private consulting firm prepared at the direction of the respondent for its use in making assessments. A judge of the Superior Court ruled that the field record cards are public records within the meaning of G.L. c. 4, § 7, Twenty-sixth, as amended through St.1969, c. 831, § 2, and that the petitioner has the right under G.L. c. 66, § 10, as appearing in St.1948, c. 550, § 5, to inspect and examine them. 1 The respondent has appealed from the judge's order directing that a writ of mandamus issue.

The following facts appear from the evidence which is reported in full. 2 Under a contract with the town dated April 3, 1969, private consultants inspected all properties in Sterling as part of a reappraisal and revaluation study in which the board of assessors was to act as 'Appraisers-in-Chief' and to make all final assessments. Pursuant to this contract, the respondent was furnished field record cards for each property inspected. These cards contain, inter alia, data pertaining to the land and neighborhood, data pertaining to the construction, age and condition of buildings on the land, and valuation computations and totals for both land and buildings. On February 23, 1971, at a meeting of the board, the petitioner requested permission to examine all field record cards in the board's possession. 3 The respondent has refused to comply with the petitioner's demand.

AS IN TOWN CRIER, INC. V. CHIEF OF POLICE OF WESTON, ANTE, ---, 282 N.E.2D ---,A the sole issue before us is whether certain records of a town are public records under the laws of the Commonwealth. In the Town Crier case, we held that, under our statutory definition of public records, a record kept by a public officer or employee is a public record only if the entries contained therein were made pursuant to a requirement of law. G.L. c. 4, § 7, Twenty-sixth. We are of opinion that this holding is dispositive in the circumstances of the instant case.

Assessors are not mere public employees but are public officers whose powers and duties are defined by statute. See Cox v. Segee, 206 Mass. 380, 382, 92 the Town Crier case, we held that, under N.E. 620; Williams v. City Manager of Haverhill, 330 Mass. 14, 15, 110 N.E.2d 851. There is no statutory mandate which requires that the board of assessors keep field record cards such as those involved in the instant case. Compare G.L. c. 59, §§ 43--46 and 49--52, requiring the making of valuation and assessment lists, and c. 59, § 60, requiring the recording of all abatements of taxes. 4 It is not enough that the field record cards are the property of the town and were obtained in the regular course of the board's business. As we have construed G.L. c. 4, § 7, Twenty-sixth, the field record cards are not public records in the absence of a requirement of law that the board keep such cards. Further, while it may be that the board uses the information collected on these cards in making the valuation and assessment lists required under G.L. c. 59, §§ 43--46 and 49--52, we have held that a record containing information which later becomes part of a public record is not a public record merely by virtue of such relation but must itself satisfy the statutory definition in all respects. TOWN CRIER, INC. V. CHIEF OF POLICE OF WESTON, ANTE, AT ---, 282 N.E.2D 379.B Cf. Mariano v. Building Inspector of Marlborough, 353 Mass. 663, 665--666, 233 N.E.2d 903. Accord, Steiner v. McMillan, 59 Mont. 30, 36, 195 P. 836; Matter of Andrews v. Police Dept. of the City of New York, 50 Misc.2d 343, 270 N.Y.S.2d 240 (N.Y.); Steel v. Johnson, 9 Wash.2d 347, 355--356, 115 P.2d 145.

Apart from records containing entries 'made or . . . required to be made by law,' the statutory definition also encompasses records which a public officer or employee 'has received or is required to receive for filing' and the official correspondence of public officers and employees. G.L. c. 4, § 7, Twenty-sixth. See Lord v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles, 347 Mass. 608, 611, 199 N.E.2d 316. The field record cards in this case, however, plainly do not come within either category. Nor are they one of the classes of records which, although not covered by the statutory definition, have been made public records by G.L. c. 66, § 17B, as amended through St.1970, c. 778. See TOWN CRIER, INC. V. CHIEF OF POLICE OF WESTON, ANTE, AT ---, 282 N.E.2D 379C.

The question whether such field record cards are public records has arisen in New Jersey under a statutory definition of public records nearly identical to our own. See N.J.Sts.Ann. § 47:3--1. We agree with the Supreme Court of New Jersey which said: '(The statutory language contains) . . . no mandate embracing the information . . . in the controversial documents . . .. The cards were the result of a contract between the township and a third party as an extracurricular endeavor to facilitate the new tax program contemplated by the public body. Admittedly they were paid for by the taxpayers' money but the mere paying by the township does not of itself constitute them public records. All information and documents kept by the municipality are not public records, yet presumably all are paid for directly or indirectly with public funds. We cannot, under the circumstances, classify the cards . . . as a public record.' Tagliabue v. North Bergen, 9 N.J. 32, 35--36, 86 A.2d 773, 775. 5

For these reasons, we conclude that the field record cards in the instant case do not constitute public records and there exists no right of public access under G.L. c. 66, § 10. 6

The order for issuance of the writ of mandamus is reversed. Judgment dismissing the petition is to be entered.

So ordered.

2 The respondent's request for a report of material facts was denied by the judge on the basis that 'there was no...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Hastings & Sons Pub. Co. v. City Treasurer of Lynn
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 18 Abril 1978
    ...682, 687, 282 N.E.2d 379 (1972), or the record had been received or required to be received for filing, Dunn v. Assessors of Sterling, 361 Mass. 692, 694, 282 N.E.2d 385 (1972); Lord v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles, 347 Mass. 608, 611, 199 N.E.2d 316 (1964). The 1973 amendment to the statuto......
  • Town Crier, Inc. v. Chief of Police of Weston
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 27 Abril 1972
    ... ... Holm, 226 Or. 27, 41, 359 P.2d 413; Conover v. Board of Educ. of Nebo Sch. Dist., 1 Utah 2d 375, 377, 267 P.2d 768. To the ... In Board of Assessors of Holyoke v. State Tax Comm., 355 Mass. 223, 243--244, 244 N.E.2d 287, ... ...
  • United States v. Letter From Alexander Hamilton to the Marquis de Lafayette Dated July 21, 1780
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • 28 Octubre 2020
    ...not establish an ownership interest and lacked standing to challenge forfeiture of lottery proceeds); Dunn v. Bd. of Assessors of Sterling, 361 Mass. 692, 693, 282 N.E.2d 385, 387 (1972) (concluding field record cards from property appraisals were not public records pursuant to Mass. Gen. L......
  • Globe Newspaper Co. v. Police Com'r of Boston
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 5 Abril 1995
    ...record merely by virtue of such relation but must itself satisfy the statutory definition in all respects." Dunn v. Assessors of Sterling, 361 Mass. 692, 694, 282 N.E.2d 385 (1972), and cases cited. Second, there is no indication that the department, either expressly or through its conduct,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT