Dunsmore v. Hartman
Citation | 140 W.Va. 357,84 S.E.2d 137 |
Decision Date | 26 October 1954 |
Docket Number | No. CC818,CC818 |
Court | Supreme Court of West Virginia |
Parties | Helen McClure DUNSMORE, Executrix of the Estate of Jewette Frederick Dunsmore, Deceased, v. John Esby HARTMAN. |
Syllabus by the Court
A demurrer to a declaration wherein damages for wrongful death are demanded in one count and damages to property are demanded in another count, should be sustained notwithstanding all of such damages are alleged to have resulted from the same wrongful act of defendant.
Dodrill, Barrett & Dunbar, Huntington, for plaintiff
Ralph J. Bean, Charles H. Bean, Moorefield, for defendant.
GIVEN, President.
Plaintiff, Helen McClure Dunsmore, executrix of the estate of Jewette Frederick Dunsmore, deceased, instituted an action in the Circuit Court of Pendleton County, against defendant, John Esby Hartman, for recovery of damages alleged to have occurred from an automobile collision. The declaration contained two counts. The first count alleged damages for wrongful death in the amount of ten thousand dollars. The second count alleged damages to the automobile of plaintiff's decedent in the amount of four hundred dollars. Defendant demurred to the declaration for the reason that it 'has improperly included a count alleging property damage with a count in which damages for wrongful death are alleged, and Plaintiff has thereby sued Defendant for a total sum in excess of that allowed by statute'. The trial court overruled the demurrer as certified the question arising thereon to this Court.
The question certified is: 'In the declaration in Trespass on the Case, in which plaintiff seeks damages for wrongful death in the amount of $10,000.00, can plaintiff also include a count in which plaintiff seeks to recover $400.00 damages for injuries caused decedent's automobile, when it is alleged that the death and the damage to the automobile occurred in the same collision?'
Plaintiff contends that since the demands of plaintiff are against the same defendant, and since both damages for wrongful death and the property damages resulted from a single wrong, there can be but one cause of action. In other words, plaintiff says that the damages for wrongful death and the property damages merely constitute different elements of damages and not different causes of action.
We are of the view that the question raised on the demurrer has been answered in the negative by the decision in the case of Alloy v. Hennis Freight Lines, W.Va., 80 S.E.2d 514, 515. In that case an action was instituted by Alloy for damages for personal injuries received by him in an automobile collision. Alloy died of the injuries before trial and, under Code, 55-7-5, as amended, the action was revived in the name of his personal representative. On the trial, a verdict was returned for plaintiff in the amount of $11,062.63. It was stipulated that ten thousand dollars thereof constituted damages for wrongful death, and that $1,062.63 thereof constituted property damages. This Court set aside the verdict and held:
In Swope v. Keystone Coal and Coke Co., 78 W.Va. 517, 89 S.E. 284, L.R.A.1917A, 1128; 14 A.L.R. 520n; 23 A.L.R. 636n, 676n, the Court stated :
In Burgess v. Gilchrist, 123 W.Va. 727, 17 S.E.2d 804, 806, 138 A.L.R. 676, it is stated: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Green ex rel. Estate of Green v. City of Welch, Civil Action No. 1:06-0159.
...Bell, 290 F.Supp.2d 701, 709 (S.D.W.Va.2003)(citing Burgess v. Gilchrist, 123 W.Va. 727, 17 S.E.2d 804, 806 (1941); Dunsmore v. Hartman, 140 W.Va. 357, 84 S.E.2d 137 (1954)). Citing the United State's Supreme Court's decision in Moor v. County of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693, 93 S.Ct. 1785, 36 L.E......
-
Bell v. Board of Educ. of County of Fayette
...the beneficiaries of the recovery. See, e.g., Burgess v. Gilchrist, 123 W.Va. 727, 17 S.E.2d 804, 806 (1941); Dunsmore v. Hartman, 140 W.Va. 357, 362, 84 S.E.2d 137, 140 (1954). Under the Supreme Court's holding in Moor, supra, the West Virginia wrongful death action, as a new and independe......
-
Baldwin v. Butcher
...Coke Company, 78 W.Va. 517, 89 S.E. 284, L.R.A.1917A, 1128. See also Jackson v. Cockill, 149 W.Va. 78, 138 S.E.2d 710; Dunsmore v. Hartman, 140 W.Va. 357, 84 S.E.2d 137; 25 A C.J.S. Death § 13. As no right of action for death by a wrongful act existed at common law, the right or cause of ac......
-
Manor Care, Inc. v. Douglas
...the decedent's estate. Syllabus Point 4, McClure v. McClure, 184 W.Va. 649, 403 S.E.2d 197 (1991). See also Dunsmore v. Hartman, 140 W.Va. 357, 361–62, 84 S.E.2d 137, 139–40 (1954) ; Peters v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co., 118 W.Va. 484, 488, 191 S.E. 581, 583 (1937).Richardson v. Kennedy, 1......