Dupuy v. U.S.

Decision Date11 June 1975
Docket NumberNo. 75-2135,75-2135
Citation518 F.2d 1295
PartiesTheodore William DUPUY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. In the Matter of a WITNESS BEFORE the GRAND JURY.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
OPINION

Before CHAMBERS, WRIGHT and SNEED, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The case is submitted without oral argument.

Dupuy is a prisoner serving a state imposed sentence at the Washington state penitentiary at Walla Walla. He was brought before a federal grand jury in Seattle, where he refused to answer questions put to him on the ground of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and on the ground that his fear that his life would be endangered by his fellow prisoners if he testified constituted "just cause" under 28 U.S.C. § 1826(a) to refuse to testify. Dupuy's Fifth Amendment claim was disposed of when the district court granted him testimonial immunity under 18 U.S.C. § 6002. The district court imposed a civil contempt sanction.

No federal court in a reported decision has held that fear of retaliation is sufficient reason to refuse to testify. To do so in this case would mean that virtually every prisoner in the United States, and many millions of people at large, would be freed of the duty to appear and testify before a grand jury. We choose to follow the reported decisions of those courts which have already held that fear of physical harm does not excuse a witness from testifying. United States v. Doe, 478 F.2d 194 (1st Cir. 1973); In re Kilgo, 484 F.2d 1215 (4th Cir. 1973); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 509 F.2d 1349 (5th Cir. 1975); LaTona v. United States, 449 F.2d 121 (8th Cir. 1971).

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • U.S. v. Powers
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • October 6, 1980
    ...consistent with a criminal contempt charge. The mitigation defense was properly rejected by the district court. Dupuy v. United States, 518 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1975). Nichols was held without bail during the trial and pending the hearing. Bail on appeal was granted following the hearing and......
  • Yoho, In re
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • March 25, 1983
    ...In re Long Visitor, 523 F.2d 443, 447-8 (8th Cir.1975); LaTona v. United States, 449 F.2d 121, 122 (8th Cir.1971); Dupuy v. United States, 518 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir.1975). II. Refusal to testify to a grand jury after a grant of immunity and a court order to do so constitutes contempt of court.......
  • U.S. v. Panza
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • November 13, 1979
    ...fear of reprisal excuse his otherwise unprivileged refusal to answer relevant questions during cross-examination. Cf. Dupuy v. United States, 518 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1975) (fear of retaliation does not justify refusal to testify before grand jury). A fear of retaliation is but one of the ma......
  • U.S. v. Doe
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • September 9, 1997
    ...order is invalidated by an appellate court, was for appellants to comply and cite the order as reversible error."); Dupuy v. United States, 518 F.2d 1295, 1295 (9th Cir.1975) ("[F]ear of physical harm does not excuse a witness from Doe also claims that his procedural due process rights were......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT