Durbano Metals, Inc. v. A & K R.R. Materials, Inc.
| Decision Date | 23 January 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 14928,14928 |
| Citation | 574 P.2d 1159 |
| Court | Utah Supreme Court |
| Parties | 23 UCC Rep.Serv. 299 DURBANO METALS, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A & K RAILROAD MATERIALS, INC., Defendant and Appellant. |
Philip C. Patterson and Findley P. Gridley of Patterson, Foley, Phillips & Gridley, Ogden, for defendant and appellant.
Glenn J. Mecham of Mecham & Richards, Ogden, for plaintiff and respondent.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the District Court of Davis County, awarding plaintiff the balance due from defendant for railroad ties and parts delivered to defendant under contract, and dismissing defendant's counterclaim. Affirmed. Costs to plaintiff.
All statutory references are to the Utah Uniform Commercial Code, Utah Code Ann., 1953, Title 70A, as amended, unless otherwise indicated.
Plaintiff and defendant are both corporations engaged in the purchase and sale of used railroad materials. On or about November 8, 1974, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement whereby defendant was to purchase, and plaintiff was to sell certain used railroad materials, to be salvaged from 15 miles of track laid in the vicinity of Chugwater, Wyoming. Plaintiff had purchased these materials from the C. & S. Railroad prior to the time the track was torn up, under a purchase order which described only " . . . 15 miles railroad trim consisting of tie plates and angle bars for 90# rail . . . ", and defendant was aware of said purchase by plaintiff. It appears that in the negotiations for the contract between these parties the defendant stated that it desired to purchase from the plaintiff the material it had recently acquired from the C. & S. and they reached an agreed price of $191 per net ton. Nothing was discussed concerning size or number of the ties or angle bars at that time.
In confirmation of their agreement, defendant sent to plaintiff a purchase order, as follows:
90,000 Each (approximately) 7 X 111/2 tie plates for 90# rail
4,800 pair (approximately) 90# joint Bars, 5 X 5 X 5 drilling
The above tie plates and joint bars compile necessary bars and plates for approximately 15 miles of track.
This purchase order was signed as accepted by plaintiff's president, Ernest Durbano.
On November 10, 1974, after an on-site inspection made by defendant's agent, defendant prepared two amended purchase orders, and sent them to the plaintiff. The first amended purchase order stated:
90,000 to 100,000 Each 71/2 X 101/2 for 9020 ARA rail, number 1 relay quality, Net ton $191.
The above tie plates compile nevessary (sic) plates for approximately 15 miles of track.
And the second amended purchase order stated:
4,800 Pair ARA Angle Bars, drilled 5 X 5 X 5 .
The above . . . angle bars compile necessary bars for 15 miles of track.
These purchase orders were neither signed as accepted nor objected to by plaintiff.
The C. & S. track was pulled up, and the parts were shipped to the defendant in 13 railroad gondola cars beginning in November, 1974, with the last gondola car arriving in May, 1975. The gondola cars contained 633.99 tons of tie plates, angle bars, and other materials. The tie plates varied as to the dimensions, and many did not conform to the dimensions as set forth in either of the purchase orders. Two of the gondolas contained 110-pound materials, rather than 90-pound.
Defendant unloaded the materials as they arrived, sorted them by size, and refused to pay for the last five shipments, claiming that some of the materials did not conform to the contract description.
Plaintiff brought action to recover the remainder of the purchase price per ton, and defendant counterclaimed for damages it incurred, claiming overpayment for the conforming goods, charges for handling costs on the nonconforming goods and for loss of anticipated profits, alleging that it had been unable to fulfill its contract with a customer in Peru which it had entered into in reliance on the contract with plaintiff.
The District Court found that the parties agreed to the purchase and sale of the 15 miles of C. & S. track, and that defendant had not relied on plaintiff's representations as to the size, dimensions or quantity of the ties and bars. The court dismissed defendant's counterclaim and awarded plaintiff the balance of the purchase price in the amount of $39,773.84.
Defendant assigns as error (1) the Court's admission of parol testimony regarding the negotiations of the parties, arguing that those negotiations were merged into and superseded by the final contract, as evidenced by the purchase orders, (2) the Court's failure to hold that the written purchase orders imposed upon plaintiff express and implied warranties of quality and merchantability that the goods would conform to the contract description under the Utah...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Messick v. PHD Trucking Service, Inc.
...665 P.2d 1292, 1293 (1983). See also Grow v. Marwick Development, Inc., Utah, 621 P.2d 1249 (1980); Durbano Metals, Inc. v. A & K Railroad Materials, Inc., Utah, 574 P.2d 1159 (1978).14 See supra n. 1.15 These facts are drawn from the lease agreement between the parties and Clark Tank Lines......
-
In re FCA U.S. Monostable Elec. Gearshift Litig.
...there it was proved that the claimant “orally agreed” to accept goods with a specific defect after having been informed of the problem. Id. at 1162 (“Defendant waived requirement that the materials be only 90-pound materials, however. The waiver occurred when defendant orally agreed to pay ......
-
Faulkner v. Farnsworth, 18142
...to explain the parties' intent. Grow v. Marwick Development, Inc., Utah, 621 P.2d 1249 (1980); Durbano Metals, Inc. v. A & K Railroad Materials, Inc., Utah, 574 P.2d 1159 (1978); E.A. Strout Western Realty Agency, Inc. v. Broderick, Utah, 522 P.2d 144 (1974). Whether an ambiguity exists is ......
-
Lake Philgas Service v. Valley Bank & Trust Co.
...to modify a contract can operate as a waiver of section 209(2)'s requirement of written modification. See Durbano Metals, Inc. v. A & K R.R. Materials, 574 P.2d 1159, 1162 (Utah 1978). Therefore, under Utah Supreme Court precedent, Lake Philgas and Bennett had the legal capacity to cancel t......