Durdin v. Warden, Case No. 2:16-cv-355
Decision Date | 06 April 2017 |
Docket Number | Case No. 2:16-cv-355 |
Parties | HENRY A. DURDIN, JR., Petitioner, v. WARDEN, MANSFIELD CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio |
Petitioner, Henry A. Durdin, Jr., an inmate at Mansfield Correctional Institution ("MCI"), filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. This matter is before the Court on the petition (Doc. 3) and the Respondent's return of writ (Doc. 7). Petitioner has not filed a traverse. For the foregoing reasons, it will be recommended that the petition be DENIED and this case be DISMISSED.
The facts of the case are summarized by the Franklin County, Ohio, Court of Appeals:
(Doc. 7, Ex. 15); State v. Durdin, 2014 WL 7462990, at *1-*3 (Franklin Cty. Dec. 30, 2014). The factual narratives set out by the state court are presumed to be correct. 28 U.S.C. §2254(e)(1).
Petitioner was indicted by the Franklin County Grand Jury on May 31, 2013, charging him with one count of kidnapping (O.R.C. §2905.01) with a firearm specification; one count of rape (O.R.C. §2907.02) with a firearm specification and a sexually violent predator specification; one count of aggravated robbery (O.R.C. §2911.01) with a firearm specification; one count of domestic violence (O.R.C. §2919.25) with a firearm specification; and one count of possessing a weapon under a disability (O.R.C. §2923.13). (Doc. 7, Ex. 1). Petitioner pleaded not guilty to the charges.
During the pretrial proceedings, Petitioner filed two motions in limine to exclude alleged hearsay testimony from Patricia Daniels, the victim's sister, and from Lindsay McNichols, the SANE nurse. Rather than rule pretrial, the court took the motions underadvisement and indicated that it would respond to any objections made during trial. (Tr. at 16-20). The State had filed a motion to depose the victim, but the motion was withdrawn on the day of the trial and no deposition occurred. (Doc. 7, Ex. 3; Tr. 20-21). Objections to the SANE nurse's testimony during trial were overruled, and the victim's sister testified without objection. (Tr. 60-61; 36-44). After the state rested its case, and again after the defense rested its case, Petitioner unsuccessfully moved for acquittal under Rule 29. (Tr. 165, 183). The jury found Petitioner guilty of all counts and specifications. (Doc. 7, Ex. 4).
On March 18, 2014, Petitioner was sentenced to twenty years to life imprisonment. The sentencing entry provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
For purposes of sentencing Counts One and Three merge and the Defendant is sentenced to Three (3) years on Count Three with an additional, consecutive Three (3) years as to the firearm specification; Eleven (11) years to Life as to Count Two, this is with the specification finding that the Defendant is a sexually violent predator (life tail), and with an additional, consecutive Three (3) years as to the firearm specification; Eighteen (18) months as to Count Four; and Two (2) years as to Count Five at the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. Counts Four and Five to be served concurrently with each other and to other counts. Count Two and Count Three to be served consecutively to each other and to...
To continue reading
Request your trial