Durgin v. Graham

Decision Date27 January 1967
Docket NumberNo. 23070.,23070.
CitationDurgin v. Graham, 372 F.2d 130 (5th Cir. 1967)
PartiesFranklin W. DURGIN, Catherine Durgin, and Orpha Durgin, Appellants, v. John T. GRAHAM, M. Smith Burns, B. Clarke Nichols, and Lindsay Newspapers, Inc., Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Franklin W. Durgin and Catherine Durgin, pro se.

B. Clarke Nichols, Naples, Fla., Tom Fairfield Brown, Tampa, Fla., for appellees.

Before GEWIN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges, and HUNTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This suit for libel was instituted in the Federal District Court against the individual defendants, appellees here. Jurisdiction is pegged on diversity and the cause of action arises from a series of incidents involving the Sarasota Juvenile Court (appellees John T. Graham and M. Smith Burns, judge and chief counselor, respectively), the Assistant State Attorney (appellee B. Clarke Nichols), and the Publisher of the Sarasota Herald Tribune (appellee Lindsa Newspapers, Inc.). The record reveals that despite the patience of several district court judges, appellants have declined to appear either personally or through counsel at any of the many proceedings below.

On October 23, 1963, the District Court entered an order of dismissal as to Lindsay Newspapers, Inc., having specifically found that appellants had willfully failed and refused to appear for the taking of their depositions. On June 28, 1965, an order of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
45 cases
  • Owen v. Wangerin
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • March 5, 1993
    ...tempered by a careful exercise of judicial discretion." Webber v. Eye Corp., 721 F.2d 1067, 1069 (7th Cir.1983) (quoting Durgin v. Graham, 372 F.2d 130, 131 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 919, 87 S.Ct. 2139, 18 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1967)) (citations omitted) (emphasis in original). The remedy ......
  • North v. Department of Mental Health
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • December 30, 1986
    ...F.2d 885, 887 (CA 5, 1968); Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's, Inc, 283 F.2d 730, 733 (CA 2, 1960); similarly, see Durgin v. Graham, 372 F.2d 130, 131 (CA 5, 1967).20 Donnelly v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp, 677 F.2d 339 (CA 3, 1982); Rogers v. Kroger Co, n. 19 supra; Jackson v. Washing......
  • Flaksa v. Little River Marine Construction Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • February 8, 1968
    ...D.C.La., 36 F.R.D. 186, affirmed, 5 Cir., 353 F.2d 737 (1966), cert. den. 384 U.S. 910, 86 S.Ct. 1352, 16 L. Ed.2d 363; Durgin v. Graham, 5 Cir., 372 F.2d 130 (1967); Deep South Oil Co. of Texas v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 2 Cir., 310 F.2d 933 (1962); Demeulenaere v. Rockwell Mfg. Co., 2......
  • United States v. $70,670.00 in U.S. Currency
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • July 8, 2019
    ...a careful exercise of judicial discretion." Durham , 385 F.2d at 368 (alteration adopted) (emphasis omitted) (quoting Durgin v. Graham , 372 F.2d 130, 131 (5th Cir. 1967) ). In Durham , we explained that "[t]he decided cases ... have generally permitted it only in the face of a clear record......
  • Get Started for Free