Durham v. State, 1 Div. 616

Decision Date05 February 1970
Docket Number1 Div. 616
Citation250 So.2d 695,287 Ala. 731
PartiesDavid G. DURHAM v. STATE. Ex parte David G. Durham.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Certiorari to Court of Criminal Appeals.

Frank W. Riggs, III, Montgomery, for petitioner.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., for the State.

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

Petition of David G. Durham for certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Durham v. State, 250 So.2d 693 (1 Div. 6).

Writ denied.

All the Justices concur, except LAWSON and COLEMAN, JJ., dissent.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Bowden v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 16 December 1988
    ... ...         C. Gamble, McElroy's Alabama Evidence § 51.01(1) (3d ed. 1977). The Court of Criminal Appeals determined that our ... However, approximately 22 years later, in the case of Durham v. State, 47 Ala.App. 89, 250 So.2d 693 (1969), then-Judge Almon, writing ... ...
  • Watson v. State, 5 Div. 56
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 8 September 1987
    ...her was properly admissible under Ex parte Deason ); Durham v. State, 47 Ala.App. 89, 250 So.2d 693 (1969), cert. denied, 287 Ala. 731, 250 So.2d 695 (1970) (wherein, in a carnal knowledge case, the court followed Harrison in affirming admission of evidence of subsequent sexual relations); ......
  • Staten v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 20 September 1988
    ...toward her was properly admissible under Ex parte Deason); Durham v. State, 47 Ala.App. 89, 250 So.2d 693 (1969), cert. denied, 287 Ala. 731, 250 So.2d 695 (1970) (wherein, in a carnal knowledge case, the court followed Harrison in affirming admission of evidence of subsequent sexual relati......
  • Durham v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 6 May 1971
    ...693. He then filed a petition in the Supreme Court for a Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals. This petition was denied, 250 So.2d 695, and the appellant filed an application for rehearing which was granted and the Writ of Certiorari Rehearing vacated; Certiorari vacated; Aff......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT