Duvall-Wheeler Livestock Barn v. United States, 26308 Summary Calendar.

Decision Date08 September 1969
Docket NumberNo. 26308 Summary Calendar.,26308 Summary Calendar.
Citation415 F.2d 226
PartiesDUVALL-WHEELER LIVESTOCK BARN et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

G. Hughel Harrison, Lawrenceville, Ga., for appellant.

Floyd M. Buford, U. S. Atty., Macon, Ga., Robert M. Heier, Alan S. Rosenthal, Attys., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804.

This consolidated appeal involves three separate actions in conversion brought by the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 1345 against the appellants, to recover the value of certain livestock in which the government possessed a security interest.

Under the provisions of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act, 7 U.S.C. § 1000 et seq., The Farmers Home Administration made four loans to Gerald L. Casaday. On each of those occasions, April 11, 1962, May 10, 1962, July 26, 1963, Casaday gave as security for the debt a Bill of Sale to Secure Debt. Each bill of sale, recorded on the day it was issued, conveyed to the government title to, inter alia, Casaday's cattle, farm equipment, and crops. As with all such conveyances, the Administration promised to reconvey title to all the property "if borrower shall pay unto the government all amounts hereby secured and shall fully perform all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions of this conveyance * * *" Each instrument then recited that it was intended as a conveyance and not as a mortgage and included a promise by Casaday not to sell, transfer, or otherwise allow the conveyance of the enumerated property without the written consent of the government.

Casaday then proceeded to have portions of the cattle covered by the bill of sale sold at public auction by the three appellants, each of whom is an auctioneer receiving commissions for the sale of livestock for others. At the time of each of the three sales Casaday owed the government $6,448.43 which has not been repaid; hence all of the cows auctioned off were, at that time, as they are now, security for his outstanding debt. The value of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Georgia Power Co. v. 54.20 Acres of Land, Land Lots 315 and 326 of 3rd Land Dist.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • November 28, 1977
    ...301, 67 S.Ct. 1604, 91 L.Ed. 2067; United States v. Yazell, 1966, 382 U.S. 341, 86 S.Ct. 500, 15 L.Ed.2d 404; Duvall-Wheeler Livestock v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 415 F.2d 226; United States v. McCleskey Mills, Inc., 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 1216.4 During the condemnation proceedings of 75-......
  • International Bank of Commerce-Brownsville v. International Energy Development Corp., COMMERCE--BROWNSVILL
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • June 18, 1998
    ... ... Southern States Transp., Inc. v. Texas, 774 S.W.2d 639, 640 ... Plas-Tex, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp., 772 S.W.2d 442, 445 ...         IEDC presented a summary damages model, which is included in the record, ... % compounded annually to begin running 10 calendar days from the date this Award is signed by the ... ...
  • Jones v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • February 14, 1984
    ... ... No. 81-5475 ... United States Court of Appeals, ... Sixth Circuit ... After the Railway filed a motion for summary judgment, the court ruled as a matter of law that ... ...
  • United States v. Hext
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • June 25, 1971
    ...1962); United States v. Kramel, 234 F.2d 577 (8th Cir. 1956). 10 409 F.2d 1216 (5th Cir. 1969); accord, DuVall-Wheeler Livestock Barn v. United States, 415 F.2d 226 (5th Cir. 1969). 11 United States v. Sommerville, 324 F.2d 712, 716, 717 (3rd Cir. 12 The Government suggests that Dixie Stock......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT