Dykstra-Gulick v. Gulick, DYKSTRA-GULIC

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Florida
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM; BARKETT
Citation620 So.2d 1256
Parties18 Fla. L. Week. S422 Sheryletitioner, v. Douglas GULICK, Respondent.
Docket NumberDYKSTRA-GULIC,No. 80486,P
Decision Date24 June 1993

Page 1256

620 So.2d 1256
18 Fla. L. Week. S422
Sheryl DYKSTRA-GULICK, Petitioner,
v.
Douglas GULICK, Respondent.
No. 80486.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 24, 1993.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal--Certified Great Public Importance, Fifth District--Case No. 91-1992 (Marion County).

Dock A. Blanchard of Blanchard, Merriam, Adel & Kirkland, P.A., Ocala, for petitioner.

Anthony J. Salzman and Ernest J. Myers of Moody, Salzman & Robertson, Gainesville, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Dykstra-Gulick v. Gulick, 604 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), which certified a question of great public importance recently answered by our opinion in Waite v. Waite, 618 So.2d 1360 (Fla.1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, Sec. 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The decision below is quashed, and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of Waite.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 practice notes
  • Parker v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr., Case No. 3:09-cv-1203-J-34JRK
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Florida
    • January 9, 2013
    ...may have held in that property. See California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991); Perez v. State, 620 So.2d 1256 (Fla. 1993); State v. Bartee, 623 So.2d 458 (Fla. 1993). Officer Freeman testified that he observed Defendant remove a sweat shirt and discard it......
  • State v. Peterson, No. 92,692.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • June 17, 1999
    ...511 So.2d 297 (Fla. 1987), though we obviously are bound by any contrary federal law in the Fourth Amendment context. Perez[ v. State, 620 So.2d 1256 We recognize that some lower federal courts have limited the doctrine to two fairly narrow circumstances. The first is when an arresting offi......
  • Smith v. State, No. 2D98-3188.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • March 17, 2000
    ...law, yoked to federal law. See Butler v. State, 706 So.2d 100, 101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (citing Art. I, § 12, Fla. Const.; Perez v. State, 620 So.2d 1256 (Fla.1993)). An appellate court reviews the trial court's factual findings to determine whether competent substantial evidence supports th......
  • Van Teamer v. State, No. 1D11–3491.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • February 12, 2013
    ...the Fourth Amendment of the United States as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. SeeFla. Const. art. I, § 12; Perez v. State, 620 So.2d 1256 (Fla.1993); Bernie v. State, 524 So.2d 988 (Fla.1988). The Fourth DCA summarized the law on traffic stops as follows: The Fourth Amendment......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
23 cases
  • Parker v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr., Case No. 3:09-cv-1203-J-34JRK
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Florida
    • January 9, 2013
    ...may have held in that property. See California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991); Perez v. State, 620 So.2d 1256 (Fla. 1993); State v. Bartee, 623 So.2d 458 (Fla. 1993). Officer Freeman testified that he observed Defendant remove a sweat shirt and discard it......
  • State v. Peterson, No. 92,692.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • June 17, 1999
    ...511 So.2d 297 (Fla. 1987), though we obviously are bound by any contrary federal law in the Fourth Amendment context. Perez[ v. State, 620 So.2d 1256 We recognize that some lower federal courts have limited the doctrine to two fairly narrow circumstances. The first is when an arresting offi......
  • Smith v. State, No. 2D98-3188.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • March 17, 2000
    ...law, yoked to federal law. See Butler v. State, 706 So.2d 100, 101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (citing Art. I, § 12, Fla. Const.; Perez v. State, 620 So.2d 1256 (Fla.1993)). An appellate court reviews the trial court's factual findings to determine whether competent substantial evidence supports th......
  • Van Teamer v. State, No. 1D11–3491.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • February 12, 2013
    ...the Fourth Amendment of the United States as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. SeeFla. Const. art. I, § 12; Perez v. State, 620 So.2d 1256 (Fla.1993); Bernie v. State, 524 So.2d 988 (Fla.1988). The Fourth DCA summarized the law on traffic stops as follows: The Fourth Amendment......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT