Dzikowski v. State

Docket Number15/11
Decision Date30 December 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
25 cases
  • In re J.H.
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • April 29, 2020
    ...particulars provided were legally sufficient.’ " Martin v. State , 218 Md. App. 1, 30, 96 A.3d 765 (2014) (quoting Dzikowski v. State , 436 Md. 430, 446-47, 82 A.3d 851 (2013) ) Therefore, the juvenile court’s decision to overrule Appellant’s exceptions to the State’s failure to respond to ......
  • Martin v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • July 30, 2014
    ...rendered a decision in Williams, 567 U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 2221, 183 L.Ed.2d 89 (2012) , as did the Court of Appeals in Dzikowski, 436 Md. 430, 82 A.3d 851 (2013). We therefore now consider the issues raised by this appeal in light of those decisions.2FACTS3 On October 27, 2008, Jodi Lynne ......
  • Sewell v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • November 29, 2018
    ...on his claim of vindictive prosecution. 209 Md. App. 174, 184, 58 A.3d 514 (2012), overruled on other grounds by Dzikowski v. State , 436 Md. 430, 456, 82 A.3d 851 (2013). In response to a fight outside of a bar, Robinson drove his car into one of the bar's security guards, who happened to ......
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • March 14, 2022
    ...purpose of which is "to guard against the taking of an accused by surprise by limiting the scope of proof ."9 See Dzikowski v. State , 436 Md. 430, 447, 82 A.3d 851 (2013) (emphasis added) (quoting McMorris v. State , 277 Md. 62, 70 n.4, 355 A.2d 438 (1976) ). Although generally a bill of p......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • VIII. Bill of Particulars
    • United States
    • The Rights of the Accused under the Sixth Amendment (ABA) Chapter 5 The Right to Be Informed of the Nature and Cause of the Accusations
    • Invalid date
    ...trial is often stated as a reason for the hesitancy to grant motions for bill of particulars.120--------Notes:[109] . Dzikowski v. State 82 A.3d 851, 857 (Md. 2013); United States v. Brown, 2014 WL 3909116 (W.D. La. Aug. 11, 2014) ("The purpose of a bill of particulars 'is to apprise a defe......