Eagleton Manuf Co v. West, Bradley Cary Manuf Co
Decision Date | 05 May 1884 |
Citation | 111 U.S. 490,28 L.Ed. 493,4 S.Ct. 593 |
Parties | EAGLETON MANUF'G CO. v. WEST, BRADLEY & CARY MANUF'G CO. and another. 1 |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Frederic H. Betts, for appellant.
Wm. C. Witter, for appellee.
This suit was brought in the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of New York, on letters patent No. 122,001, granted to the plaintiff, the Eagleton Manufacturing Company, December 19, 1871, for an 'improvement in japanned furniture springs.' The patent contains these recitals: 'Whereas, J. J. Eagleton, of New York, New York, (Sarah N. Eagleton, administratrix,) has presented to the commissioner of patents a petition praying for the grant of letters patent for an alleged new and useful improvement in japanned furniture springs, (she having assigned her right, title, and interest in said improvement, as administratrix, to Eagleton Manufacturing Company, of same place,) a description of which invention is contained in the specification of which a copy is hereto annexed and made a part hereof, and has complied with the various requirements of law in such cases made and provided; and whereas, upon due examination made, the said claimant is adjudged to be justly entitled to a patent under the law.' The specification of the patent is as follows: There are two claims, namely: '(1) The method, herein described, of strengthening metal springs; (2) as an improved article of manufacture, a spring made substantially as herein described.'
Eagleton, as inventor, filed in the patent-office, on the sixth of July, 1868, a petition for a patent for an 'improvement in furniture springs,' accompanied by an affidavit, a specification, a drawing, and a model, and the proper fee, and, in the petition, appointed Munn & Co. 'to act as his attorneys in presenting the application, and making all such alterations and amendments as may be required, and to sign his name to the drawings.' The affidavit, that Eagleton verily believed himself to be 'the original and first inventor of the within described improvement in furniture springs,' was sworn to by him June 26, 1868. The specification then filed was as follows: 'Be it known that I, J. Joseph Eagleton, of New York, in the county of New York and state of New York, have invented a new and useful improvement in furniture springs, and I do hereby declare that the following is a full, clear, and exact description thereof, which will enable others skilled in the art to make and use the same, reference being had to the accompanying drawings forming part of this specification, in which the drawing represents a furniture spring provided, according to my improvement, with a japan covering. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Schaum & Uhlinger, Inc. v. Copley-Plaza Operating Co.
... ... first of these cases Mr. Justice Bradley said: ... ''The ... mixing of certain ... Compare, ... also, Eagleton Mfg. Co. v. West, etc., Mfg. Co., 111 ... U.S ... ...
-
Coltman v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.
...and claims. The cases of Chicago & N. W. Railway Co. v. Sayles, 97 U.S. 554, 24 L.Ed. 1053, and Eagleton Mfg. Co. v. West Mfg. Co., 111 U.S. 490, 4 S.Ct. 593, 28 L.Ed. 493, announce the rule applicable in such Admittedly, the same rule applies to the divisional application and patent as gov......
-
Willamette-Hyster Co. v. Pacific Car & Foundry Co.
...were also prior to his claimed invention. Eagleton Mfg. Co. v. West, Bradley & Cary Mfg. Co., C.C., 2 F. 774, 777 affirmed 111 U.S. 490, 4 S.Ct. 593, 28 L.Ed. 493; cf. Hann v. Venetian Blind Corp., 9 Cir., 111 F.2d The cross-appellee also contends that Langdon's patent was anticipated by th......
-
Heller Bros. Co. v. Crucible Steel Co. of America
... ... We think that Eagleton Mfg ... Co. v. West, etc., Mfg. Co., 111 U.S ... ...