Earle v. Coyle
Decision Date | 22 June 1899 |
Docket Number | 82. |
Citation | 95 F. 99 |
Parties | EARLE v. COYLE. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Asa W Waters and W. H. Addicks, for plaintiff.
R. M Schick, for defendant.
The facts agreed upon by the parties appear in the following case stated:
'The Chestnut Street National Bank was duly incorporated and organized in the year 1887 as a national bank under the laws of the United States, and was located in Philadelphia. Prior to the 13th day of February, 1894, the decedent, D Lynn Coyle, was the owner of five (5) shares of stock in the said bank. His name was entered in the books of the bank as the owner of said five (5) shares, and he held a certificate therefor in the form hereinafter set out. On the said 13th day of February, 1894, the said decedent placed the said five (5) shares of stock with Barnes & Lofland, auctioneers, doing business at Philadelphia, for sale at public auction, and the same were put up at public sale by them on the said day, and knocked down to William Steele at the price of one hundred dollars ($100) per share, or five hundred dollars ($500) for the five (5) shares. At the time of the sale the said bank was in good credit in the said city, and the said decedent had no reason whatever to believe that it was insolvent, or was about to become so, but, on the contrary, believed it to be solvent.
At the said time the said decedent delivered his certificate for the said five (5) shares of stock to the said Barnes & Lofland, the same having indorsed upon it an assignment of the said shares in blank, with a power of attorney in blank to transfer the same, which assignment and power of attorney were signed by the said D. Lynn Coyle. A copy of said certificate and the said assignment and power of attorney is as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Warren v. Nix
...duty it is to make the proper transfers on the books of the corporation, he is relieved from further liability. 30 U. S. (Law. Ed.) 266; 95 F. 99; Cyc. 716, 717. Section 849, Kirby's Dig., is intended for the protection of the individual creditors of the stockholders. The transferrer is in ......
-
Cunningham v. Wrenn
...have the transfer recorded. Hayes v. Shoemaker (C. C.) 39 F. 319; Young v. McKay, supra; Snyder v. Foster (C. C. A.) 73 F. 136; Earle v. Coyle (C. C.) 95 F. 99; Dellert v. Stallman (C. C. A.) 29 F.(2d) The defendants were not required to take the certificates to the bank for the purpose of ......
-
Hunt v. Seeger
...as a stockholder ceases, although the transfer is not so entered. Hayes v. Shoemaker, 39 F. 319; Whitney v. Butler, 118 U.S. 655; Earle v. Coyle, 95 F. 99; Matteson v. Dent, 176 U.S. 531; Webster Upton, 91 U.S. 65; Russell v. Easterbrook, 71 Conn. 50; Choteau v. Harris, 20 Mo. 383; Cox v. E......
-
Earle v. Coyle
...court, following the decision of the supreme court in Whitney v. Butler, 118 U.S. 655, 7 Sup.Ct. 61, gave judgment for the defendant. (C.C.) 95 F. 99. appears that on February 13, 1894, D. Lynn Coyle was the owner of five shares (of the par value of $100 each) of the stock of the said bank,......