Eastern Connecticut Citizens Action Group, Inc. v. Dole, 403

Decision Date07 November 1986
Docket NumberD,No. 403,403
Citation804 F.2d 804
PartiesEASTERN CONNECTICUT CITIZENS ACTION GROUP, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Elizabeth H. DOLE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ocket 86-6162.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Jon D. Berman, South Windsor, Conn. (Berman, Curry & Russo, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jacques B. Gelin, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (F. Henry Habicht II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Stanley A. Twardy, Jr., U.S. Atty., New Haven, Conn., John B. Hughes, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Haven, Conn., David C. Shilton, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for defendants-appellees Elizabeth H. Dole, John Bestgen and James J. Barakos.

Kathryn Mobley, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Conn., Hartford, Conn. (Cornelius F. Tuohy, Robert T. Morrin, Asst. Attys. Gen., State of Conn., Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for defendant-appellee J. William Burns.

Before FEINBERG, Chief Judge, OAKES and KEARSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Jose A. Cabranes, J., granting summary judgment to defendants and dismissing for lack of ripeness plaintiffs' lawsuit seeking injunctive and declaratory relief. 638 F.Supp. 1297 (D.Conn.1986). Plaintiffs claim, among other things, that defendants have failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 4321 et seq. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Cabranes's opinion. Our decision is without prejudice to whatever rights plaintiffs may have in state court to challenge under state law the State of Connecticut's acquisition of property in connection with a proposed highway project.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Save Barton Creek Ass'n v. Federal Highway Admin. (FHWA), 91-8036
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • January 17, 1992
    ..."final agency action"); Eastern Connecticut Citizens Action Group v. Dole, 638 F.Supp. 1297, 1299-1300 (D.Conn.), aff'd per curiam, 804 F.2d 804 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1068, 107 S.Ct. 2460, 95 L.Ed.2d 869 (1987) (finding the claims not ripe for judicial review because, inter ......
  • Gomez v. Coughlin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • April 20, 1988
    ...... Facility, commenced this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has moved for summary ...Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-250, 106 S.Ct. 2505, ......
  • Varrone v. Bilotti
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • August 18, 1997
    ...... the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York seeking damages under 42 ... liable for an allegedly unlawful official action generally turns on the "objective legal ......
  • Jimenez v. Wood County
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • September 22, 2010
    ...... the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.        Before GARZA ...Medtronic, Inc., 254 F.3d 573, 577 (5th Cir.2001) (quoting ...See Quick Techs., Inc. v. Sage Group PLC, 313 F.3d 338, 343 n. 3 (5th Cir.2002) ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT