Eastern Consolidators, Inc. v. W. L. McAviney Properties, Inc.
| Citation | 159 Conn. 510,271 A.2d 59 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Connecticut |
| Decision Date | 16 June 1970 |
| Parties | EASTERN CONSOLIDATORS, INC. v. W. L. McAVINEY PROPERTIES, INC. |
W. Paul Flynn, New Haven, for appellant (plaintiff).
Robert K. Walsh, New Haven, with whom, on the brief, was Walter W. Walsh, New Haven, for appellee (defendant).
Before ALCORN, C.J., and HOUSE, THIM, RYAN and SHAPIRO, JJ.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to obtain specific performance of a contract in which the defendant agreed to sell and convey certain premises to the plaintiff for an agreed price. The plaintiff expressly alleged that on the date of the contract, and ever since, it had been ready, able and willing to perform the agreement and had offered to do so. In its answer, the defendant denied these specific allegations. This denial put these allegations in issue, with the burden on the plaintiff to prove them. Silva v. Hartford, 141 Conn. 126, 128, 104 A.2d 210.
The court rendered judgment for the defendant. In its finding, which the plaintiff has not attacked, the court expressly found that there was no evidence that on the day of the contract or on any day thereafter the plaintiff was ready and able or even offered to perform its contractual promises, particularly to pay the purchase price.
The unattacked finding further discloses that at the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence the court specifically called to the attention of the plaintiff's counsel the allegation of the plaintiff that it was and had been ready, able and willing to perform its part of the agreement and asked, 'Now, have you offered all the proof on that issue that you intend to offer?' The reply was, 'I have, sir.'
The finding further discloses that the plaintiff made no claims of law respecting the judgment to be rendered and filed no brief, although the court fixed a time for the filing of briefs, which time was twice extended. The appendix to the brief of the plaintiff filed in this court contains no evidence that the plaintiff was ready, able and willing to perform the obligations it undertook under the provisions of the contract. See Practice Book § 721.
On these facts, and in the absence of any evidence to support the plaintiff's allegations of readiness, willingness and ability to perform its promises as contained in the agreement, the court concluded, on the authority of Phillips v. Sturm, 91 Conn. 331, 335, 99 A. 689, that the plaintiff was not entitled to judgment. This was a correct conclusion. See Godburn v. Meserve, 130 Conn. 723, 726, 37 A.2d 235; Lunde v. Minch, 105 Conn. 657, 659, 136 A. 552; Stierle v. Rayner, 92...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Landmark Inv. Group v. Chung Family Realty P'ship Llc.
...willingness and ability to perform its promises as contained in the agreement...." Eastern Consolidators, Inc. v. W.L. McAviney Properties, Inc., 159 Conn. 510, 511, 271 A.2d 59 (1970). 22 Glenn Russo, Landmark's manager, testified as follows:"[Landmark's Counsel]: Mr. Russo, does Alicia Ru......
-
Allen v. Nissley
...of proving that he was ready, willing and able at all times to purchase the property. Eastern Consolidators, Inc. v. W. L. McAviney Properties, Inc., 159 Conn. 510, 510-11, 271 A.2d 59 (1970). The defendant claims error in the trial court's conclusion that the plaintiff was ready, willing a......
-
Frumento v. Mezzanotte
...burden of proving that he was ready, willing and able at all times to purchase the property. Eastern Consolidators, Inc. v. W.L. McAviney Properties, Inc., 159 Conn. 510, 510-11, 271 A.2d 59 (1970)." Allen v. Nissley, 184 Conn. 539, 542, 440 A.2d 231 (1981). The plaintiff must meet this bur......
-
Argentinis v. Gould
...breach of contract claims. A general denial does not place any burden on the denier; Eastern Consolidators, Inc. v. W.L. McAviney Properties, Inc., 159 Conn. 510, 510-11, 271 A.2d 59 (1970); and the burden is properly placed on the party seeking recovery. Lukas v. New Haven, 184 Conn. 205, ......