Easton v. Hall
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | DUNN |
| Citation | Easton v. Hall, 323 Ill. 397, 154 N.E. 216 (Ill. 1926) |
| Decision Date | 15 December 1926 |
| Docket Number | No. 17302.,17302. |
| Parties | EASTON v. HALL et al. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Suit by Charles S. Easton against Charles H. Hall and others to construe will of Sarah D. Easton, deceased. From the decree, complainant, named defendant, and others appeal. Certain other defendants assigned cross-errors.
Reversed and remanded, with directions.
Shelton F. McGrath and George W. Hunt, both of Peoria, and Cooke, Sullivan & Ricks, of Chicago (George A. Cooke and Edward H. Fiedler, both of Chicago, of counsel), for appellant Charles S. Easton.
John M. Elliott and Bruce E. Dwinell, both of Peoria, and Winston, Strawn & Shaw, of Chicago (James H. Cartwright, of Chicago, of counsel), for Charles H. Hall and others, executors and trustees.
Jack, Irwin & Jack, of Peoria, for appellee Women's Christian Home Mission.
C. E. McNemar, of Peoria, for appellee Universalist Church of Peoria.
Dailey, McCormick & Radley, of Peoria, for appellee Eleanor R. Easton.
Allen & Converse, of Springfield, and Clarence W. Heyl, of Peoria, guardian ad litem for other appellees.
Charles S. Easton, the son and only heir of Sarah D. Easton, filed a bill in the circuit court of Peoria county for the construction of his mother's will, alleging that various parts of the will were invalid because they were in violation of the rule against perpetuities, and praying that the invalid provisions be decreed to be of no effect, and that the fee-simple title of all the property of the testatrix affected by them be decreed to be in the complainant, as the sole heir of the testatrix. A decree was entered, finding that some of the provisions of the will violated the rule against perpetuities and were void, and that others of the provisions attacked by the bill were valid. Separate appeals were perfectedby the complainant and by the executors and trustees under the will, and cross-errors have been assigned by several of the beneficiaries. The appeals have been submitted together on one record, and in this opinion the term ‘appellant’ refers to the complainant and the term ‘appellees' to all other parties.
The will was executed on October 30, 1919, and the testatrix died on December 24, 1924, at the age of 77 years. The will in its first and second paragraphs revoked all former wills, and directed the payment of the testatrix's debts. The fourth paragraph made a bequest of $5,000 to her brother Charles H. Hall. The fifth paragraph directed $5,000 to be invested in safe interest-bearing securities and the net interest or income therefrom to be paid to the testatrix's brother George S. Hall quarterly, and if, after he was incapacitated from working or earning a salary, his needs required more than the net income from the fund of $5,000, the use of so much of the principal as his immediate needs might require from time to time was authorized, and at his death whatever should remain of the fund was directed to be paid to Jessie E. Hall Furst and Edward F. Hall, the children of George S. Hall. The sixth paragraph made bequests of $100 to a niece, Jessie E. Hall Furst, and $500 to a nephew, Edward F. Hall. These paragraphs were not questioned and were held valid.
Paragraphs 3, 7, 9, 14, and 15, are as follows:
‘(7) All of the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, real, personal and mixed, wheresoever found or located, of which I die seized or possessed, or which may come to my estate in any manner after my death, I give, devise and bequeath unto my brother Charles H. Hall and Mr. Frank T. Miller, both of Peoria, Illinois, as trustees, for the uses and purposes and with powers following, to-wit:
‘(b) My said trustees shall pay to Eleanor R. Easton, widow of my son George B. Easton, deceased, so long as she does not remarry, the sum of three thousand dollars ($3,000) annually, payable in equal monthly installments of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) each.
‘(c) In case of the death of my said son Charles S. Easton leaving him surviving no children, but leaving him surviving a widow, then it is my desire that the sum of three thousand dollars ($3,000) annually, payable in monthly installments of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) each, shall be paid to said widow as long as she shall not remarry; my intention being to provide an income for the widow of each of my said sons as long as they do not remarry, and upon the remarriage of either of them said annuities as to such shall cease and determine, and upon the remarriage of the remaining one, the said annuity as to her shall determine, and thereupon said trust shall end.’
‘(9) I direct that no title or interest in any of the several trust funds in my will created, or in the money or other property composing them, or in the income accruing therefrom, or any of its accumulations, shall vest in any beneficiary under any such trust during the continuance of this trust, nor shall any beneficiary acquire any right in or title to any installments or installment of income other than by and through the actual payment of each installment, respectively, by the trustees of the respective trust estates to such beneficiary in person only, nor shall any beneficiary have any right or power, by draft, assignment or otherwise, to anticipate, to pledge or mortgage, or in anywise incumber or assign in advance any installment or installments of income, nor to give any orders in advance upon the trustees for any installments, nor shall any of the same be subject at any time to any judgment, execution, attachment, levy or to any proceeding whatsoever.’
‘(14) I direct that the provision of the will of my late husband, Edward S. Easton, creating a trust to provide for annuities to my son Charles S. Easton and his former wife, Jennie F. Easton, shall be continued and carried out by my said trustees during the lives of said Charles S. Easton and Jennie F. Easton; and all powers herein conferred on such trustees are extended to cover this trust.
‘(15) Upon the death of all the beneficiaries of the trust established by me herein, all of said estate shall by my said trustees be converted into cash, and said entire trust estate shall thereafter be by my said trustees divided as follows:
‘One-sixth (1/6) thereof to the Women's Christian Home Mission, commonly known as Home of the Friendless, of Peoria, Illinois, the same to be used to carry out the purposes for which said institution was established.
‘The remaining two-thirds (2/3) of my residuary estate shall go to my heirs at law then living, in accordance with the laws of the state of Illinois for the succession of property.’
Paragraph 8 confers power upon the trustees in the administration of the trust; paragraph 10 provides for the appointment of their successors; paragraph 11 for the filing of a bond; paragraph 12 nominates the testatrix's brother Charles H. Hall and Frank T. Miller executors and trustees; and paragraph 13 provides for their compensation.
The provision of the will of the testatrix's husband, Edward S. Easton, creating a trust to provide for annuities for Charles S. Easton and his former wife, Jennie F. Easton, is as follows:
‘Third-I give and bequeath to my executors hereinafter named, to be continued after the settlement of my estate in the probate court, as trustees under this will, the sum of $20,000 in trust for the following uses and purposes:
‘To invest...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Tumlin v. Troy Bank & Trust Co.
...benefitted, yet the holding was that the rule was violated. Many other sustentive authorities could be cited, but see also Easton v. Hall, 323 Ill. 397, 154 N.E. 216, and In re Tift, 110 Misc. 624, 180 N.Y.S. There are many contingent features of this will precedent not only to the vesting ......
-
Williams v. Crickman
...intent of the testator. (See Millikin National Bank v. Wilson (1931), 343 Ill. 55, 64-65, 174 N.E. 857, 861; Easton v. Hall (1926), 323 Ill. 397, 422-23, 154 N.E. 216, 224-25; Beal v. Higgins (1921), 299 Ill. 229, 233-35, 132 N.E.2d 542, 543-44; Wood v. Wood (1914), 263 Ill. 285, 292, 104 N......
-
Corwin v. Rheims
...in the postponement of its enjoyment. Ashmore v. Newman, 350 Ill. 64, 183 N.E. 1;Nicol v. Morton, 332 Ill. 533, 164 N.E. 5;Easton v. Hall, 323 Ill. 397, 154 N.E. 216. In applying the rule, the court first construes the instrument creating the estates or interests and ascertains the intent o......
-
Swain v. Bowers
...as a gift to a class, vesting in its members living at the testator's death and opening to let in after-born members.” In Easton v. Hall, 323 Ill. 397, 154 N. E. 216, cited by appellants in support of their contention that the trusts are invalid because the property “may be held by the trus......
-
A Will for Willa Cather.
...of the rule against remoteness is void." Id. at 515 n.5 (citing Inst. for Sav. v. Roxbury Home, 139 N.E. 301 (Mass. 1923); Easton v. Hall, 154 N.E. 216 (Ill. 1926)). But see Robert H. Sitkoff, The Lurking Rule Against Accumulations of Income, 100 NW. U. L. REV. 501, 506 n.31 (2006) [hereina......
-
An historical analysis of the binding effect of class suits.
...not in esse were sufficiently represented by living members of the same class in a compromise family settlement); Easton v. Hall, 154 N.E. 216, 225 (Ill. 1926) (holding that the equity rule which states that parties not before a court are not bound by its decrees may be excepted where parti......