Eaton v. Beto

Decision Date27 December 1966
Docket NumberNo. 23628.,23628.
Citation368 F.2d 839
PartiesClois EATON, Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Clois Eaton, pro se.

Allo B. Crow, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. of Texas, Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Asst. Atty. Gen., T. B. Wright, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Howard M. Fender, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for appellee.

Before JONES, WISDOM and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The appellant was denied habeas corpus relief from a state court conviction and has appealed. It appears that the appellant is presently serving under a sentence of a different conviction than that from which he seeks relief. It follows, therefore, that there was and is no jurisdiction to consider the petition. The order of the district court will be affirmed without prejudice to the right to seek the relief sought at such time as it would be effective if granted.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Brown v. Justice's Court of Carson Tp., Ormsby County
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 7 Junio 1967
    ...of California, 352 F.2d 439 (9th Cir. 1965); Commonwealth ex rel. Banky v. Ashe, 142 Pa.Super. 396, 16 A.2d 668 (1940); Eaton v. Beto, 368 F.2d 839 (5th Cir. 1966); McNally v. Hill, Warden, 293 U.S. 131, 55 S.Ct. 24, 79 L.Ed. 238 (1934); Boseant v. Fitzharris, 370 F.2d 105 (9th Cir. 1966); ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT