Echeandia v. United States Attorney General, 71 Civ. 5520.
| Decision Date | 21 March 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 71 Civ. 5520.,71 Civ. 5520. |
| Citation | 339 F. Supp. 272 |
| Parties | Luis A. ECHEANDIA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Luis A. Echeandia, pro se.
Whitney North Seymour, U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., New York City (Gerald A. Feffer, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel), for respondent.
Petitioner, based upon 18 U.S.C., section 3568, which provides that a defendant shall receive "credit toward service of his sentence for any days spent in custody in connection with the offense or acts for which sentence was imposed," seeks credit toward the federal sentence he is now serving for time spent in a Maryland state prison while awaiting trial and prior to his conviction and sentencing on the state charge.
Petitioner, upon his conviction of a federal charge in this court, was sentenced in December 1960 to a five-year term of imprisonment. He was released on parole on January 28, 1963. He was thereafter arrested in Maryland on a state charge on July 2, 1965, and bail was granted, but in lieu thereof he was confined pending trial. On July 13, a federal non-bondable parole violation warrant against him was lodged with the Maryland authorities. He was tried and convicted on the state charge on June 15, 1966, and thereupon sentenced to an eight-year term of imprisonment. He was transferred to state prison where he continued to serve his state sentence until June 26, 1967, when he was released to the federal parole violation detainer and resumed serving his federal sentence. After a period he was again released on parole, but he was then taken into custody for parole violation to complete service of the balance of his original five-year sentence, which he is currently serving.
Petitioner contends he is entitled to credit for the state jail time which he served while awaiting trial and until his conviction on the state charge; that during that period he was precluded from obtaining his release because of the non-bailable federal parole violation detainer lodged against him; that he was then effectively "in custody in connection with the federal offense" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C., section 3568, as interpreted in Davis v. Attorney General, 425 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1970), and thus entitled to credit on his federal sentence from the date the detainer was lodged against him.
In order to receive credit under Davis, it must appear that the time petitioner was in state custody was not credited toward his state sentence. Radcliffe v. Clark, 451 F.2d 250, 251 (5th Cir. 1971) (per curiam); Doss v. United States, 449...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Blondin
...due to parole violation; other courts faced with similar claims have declined to award double credit); Echeandia v. United States Attorney General, 339 F.Supp. 272, 273 (S.D.N.Y.1972) Courts in other jurisdictions that have statutes modeled after § 3568 have also refused to grant double cre......
-
State v. Boettcher
...state courts had failed to do so. Such credit was not, however, to be duplicative. As stated by Judge Weinfeld in Echeandia v. United States Attorney General, 339 F.Supp. 272, 273 (S.D.N.Y.1972), "In order to receive credit [under the federal law] it must appear that the time petitioner was......