Ed Harper v. State

Decision Date13 November 1893
CitationEd Harper v. State, 13 So. 882, 71 Miss. 202 (Miss. 1893)
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesED HARPER v. THE STATE

October 1893

FROM the circuit court of Attala county, HON. C. H. CAMPBELL Judge.

Appellant Ed Harper, was indicted jointly with another for the offense of burglary and larceny, the indictment charging that they feloniously and burglariously broke into a store-house and stole therefrom certain clothing, the house and clothing being the property of Kelly & Mills. A severance was granted and, on the trial of appellant, evidence was introduced tending to show that, soon after the clothing was missing, some of it was found in the possession of accused. In view of the opinion, it is not necessary to set out the evidence.

The instruction for the state the granting of which this court condemns, is as follows:

"1. The court instructs the jury that where a burglary is shown to have been committed, and possession of the stolen goods is proved recently after the loss of said goods, then the finding of the stolen goods is presumptive evidence that the possessor thereof committed not only larceny, but burglary, and if the jury believe from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Kelly & Mills' store was broken into, and that goods were found in the possession of the accused that were taken out of said store, and belonged to Kelly & Mills, then the law presumes defendant is guilty of the crime charged, unless said possession is reasonably accounted for, and explained by the evidence in the case."

Defendant was convicted, and, after motion for new trial overruled, appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Anderson Haden & Davis for appellant.

There is no evidence that the goods traced to appellant's possession had been recently stolen. The effect of such evidence, if there was any, should have been left to the jury without any instruction. Matthews v. State, 61 Miss. 155.

Frank Johnston, attorney-ge...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
14 cases
  • Heard v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 11, 1937
    ... ... the crime, and this proof must be made by competent evidence ... beyond every reasonable doubt ... Section ... 896, Code of 1930; 9 R. C. L. 1277; Carter v. Eastman ... Gardner & Co., 95 Miss. 651, 48 So. 615; Walker v ... State, 146 Miss. 510, 112 So. 673; Harper v. State, 71 ... Miss. 202, 13 So. 882 ... Webb M ... Mize, Assistant Attorney-General, for the state ... The ... court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the ... indictment ... The ... various people named in the indictment and the [177 Miss ... 666] ... ...
  • Wood v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 4, 1929
    ...therefrom." This instruction properly announces the law. Harris v. State, 61 Miss. 304; Cook v. State (Miss.), 28 So. 833; Harper v. State, 71 Miss. 202, 13 So. 882; 9 C. 1080. It is true that the burglary must be proven by evidence independent of the recent possession of property then stol......
  • Haynes v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1937
    ...they must infer it, or that the law infers it for them. Stokes v. State, 58 Miss. 677; Matthews v. State, 61 Miss. 155; Harper v. State, 71 Miss. 202, 13 So. 882; v. State, 119 So. 332. W. D. Conn, Jr., Assistant Attorney-General, for the state. It is strenuously insisted by appellant here ......
  • Wade v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • April 13, 1936
    ...explained. It is only a presumption or inference of fact. Stokes v. State, 58 Miss. 677; Matthews v. State, 61 Miss. 155; Harper v. State 71 Miss. 202, 13 So. 882; Snowden v. State, 62 Miss. 100; 36 C. J., page par. 434, note 44 and pages 877, 878, par. 434. It is unthinkable that appellant......
  • Get Started for Free