Eddy v. Weaver

Decision Date05 November 1887
Citation15 P. 492,37 Kan. 540
PartiesGEORGE A. EDDY, et al., v. N. E. WEAVER, et al
CourtKansas Supreme Court

[Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Error from Harvey District Court.

THIS action was tried by the court below without a jury, and on April 6,1885, the court made findings of fact and a conclusion of law as follows, to wit:

"FINDINGS OF FACT.

"Prior and up to December 4,1877, one William Hall Mitchell was engaged in the business of retailing drugs, and so forth, at Larned, Kansas, and was largely in debt and wholly insolvent. On the 18th day of October, 1887, Stiefel & Ney recovered a judgment against Mitchell for $ 56, and costs of suit. On December 4, 1877, John A. Moore commenced a civil action in attachment against Mitchell for $ 105, before F. A. A. Neals a justice of the peace of Larned township, Pawnee county Kansas, and at the same time Weaver & Bill, plaintiffs herein, commenced two actions before the same justice of the peace, one for $ 235, and one for $ 205, and caused orders of attachment in said actions to be issued; all of said attachments in said three suits were placed in the hands of L. P. Elliott, a constable of Larned township, in said county and state, and were by said constable each and all levied upon the stock of drugs and medicines of Mitchell. Said John A. Moore and Weaver & Bill at said time were each and all nonresidents of Pawnee county, Kansas, and were each and all residents of Lyon county, Kansas, and each and all of them failed to give a cost bond in said cases, except the bonds given for attachments, until December 8, 1877, at which time they filed a cost bond in each of said cases; each and all of said attachments so issued were levied upon said stock of drugs and medicines on December 4, 1877; each of said cases was set for trial, and said attachments made returnable on December 7, 1877, at which time Mitchell appeared before said justice of the peace, and filed an affidavit in due form under section --, chapter 81, Compiled Laws of Kansas, for a change of venue, which application was by said justice of the peace overruled; said causes were continued for trial until December 8, 1877, at 10 A. M., at which time the same were on the application of Mitchell continued for trial until January 10, 1878. On January 8, 1878, said Bill, one of plaintiffs paid Mitchell about $ 25 to confess judgment in all said cases for the amounts claimed therein, and waive all errors and irregularities in said suits, which Mitchell did in writing, having consented before said justice that the continuance should be set aside and each of said cases called for trial. Mitchell had no defense to the merits of either of said causes of action, and was justly indebted to Weaver & Bill and J. A. Moore the several amounts for which he confessed judgment, and the said Bill paid said amount to save the expenses the parties would necessarily be at if the suits were tried. On the 8th day of December, 1877, Mitchell, with George A. Eddy, Jerry Toles, T. H. Edwards, and Nelson Adams, as sureties, entered into a forthcoming bond to John A. Moore and Weaver & Bill in the sum of $ 2,400, conditioned that the property so attached in said actions, or the sum of $ 1,100, its appraised value thereof, should be forthcoming to answer the judgments in said actions, which bond was taken and approved by L. P. Elliott, constable, on December 8, 1877, a true copy of which bond is attached to the petition herein; and the constable made the following return on each of said orders of attachment:

"'Surrendered the property attached in this case on the execution and delivery to me of bond, a copy of which is herein attached, and marked 'Exhibit A,' February 8, 1878.--L. P. ELLIOTT, Constable.'

"'Which said bond was taken and approved by said constable on December 8, 1878.--L. P. ELLIOTT, Constable.'

"Said bond was procured to be issued by George A. Eddy, in order that the execution issued in his favor, as hereinafter set forth, might be levied upon said attached property, and that while the bond purported to be made by Mitchell as principal and the others as sureties, it was as a matter of fact procured and executed by George A. Eddy for the purpose aforesaid, of which the plaintiff at the time had no information or knowledge; on December 4, 1877, an execution was issued upon the judgment of Stiefel & Ney to the said Elliott; on December 4, 1877, George A. Eddy commenced before a justice of the peace at Larned three actions against William Hall Mitchell, one to recover the sum of $ 81, one to recover the sum of $ 219.50, and one to recover the sum of $ 88.50; and on the same day Gillett & Co. commenced an action against Mitchell for the sum of $ 163, and Gillett, Armstrong & Kelly commenced an action against Mitchell for the sum of $ 155, and Myers & Myers commenced an action against Mitchell for the sum of $ 165; and also on the same day Adam Brewer commenced an action for $ 77.50; and also on the same day J. A. Blackman commenced an action against Mitchell for the sum of $ 84.52. In each of said actions an order of attachment was issued and delivered to the constable, Elliott, who levied each of them upon a stock of goods, wares and merchandise belonging to Mitchell, then and at that time in his possession under the levies made upon the orders of attachment issued in the cases of Weaver & Bill and John A. Moore against Mitchell; and all orders of attachment received by constable Elliott, other than those in favor of Weaver & Bill and John A. Moore, were levied upon such property subsequent to and subject to the orders of attachment levied thereon in favor of Weaver & Bill and John A. Moore; all of the orders of attachment above referred to, other than those in favor of Weaver & Bill and John A. Moore, were returnable and were returned on December 8, 1877, at which time each of the actions in which they were issued was set for trial, and said orders of attachment were then released and discharged. On the eighth day of December, 1877, judgments were rendered in each of the actions commenced against Mitchell as herein stated for the amounts claimed and costs, except in the two actions commenced by Weaver & Bill and in the action commenced by John A. Moore; and upon said day an ordinary execution was issued upon each judgment so rendered, and placed in the hands of constable Elliott, prior to the delivering to him the forthcoming bond. After the execution and delivery and approval of the forthcoming bonds and the return made by the constable upon the orders of attachment in favor of Weaver & Bill and John A. Moore as aforesaid, William Hall Mitchell demanded of constable Elliott the delivery to him of the property which had been attached and for the delivery of which the forthcoming bond had been executed, which demand the constable Elliott, at the instance and request of the defendants Nelson Adams and George A. Eddy, refused and failed to comply with, and he, the constable Elliott, at the special instance and request of the defendants Nelson Adams and George A. Eddy, as soon as he had approved the forthcoming bond and made return on said orders of attachment in favor of Weaver & Bill and John A. Moore, levied upon the property of Mitchell which he had taken under the orders of attachments last named, and to release which said forthcoming bond had been given, an execution in favor of George A. Eddy for the sum of $ 90, and also levied thereon, subject to such first levy, an execution in favor of George A. Eddy, for the sum of $ 91, and also levied thereon, subject to said two first executions, another execution in favor of the said George A. Eddy, for the sum of $ 225, and also levied thereon, subject to said three other executions, an execution in favor of Gillett & Co., for the sum of $ 175, and also levied thereon, subject to said four executions, an execution in favor of Armstrong & Kelly for the sum of $ 165, and also levied thereon, subject to the levies of said five executions mentioned, all other executions in his hands, amounting to about the sum of $ 327.

"The levies of said executions were made in the order stated about one-half hour after the execution of said forthcoming bond and after the return of said orders of attachment in favor of Weaver & Bill; afterward, and on the 23d and 24th days of December, 1877, at the special instance and request of the defendants George A. Eddy and Nelson Adams, the constable Elliott, having duly advertised the same, sold at public auction the goods so advertised for the sum of ten hundred and fifty dollars, on the executions so levied thereon as aforesaid, in the order in which they were levied as aforesaid, and applied the proceeds at the special instance and request of the defendants George A. Eddy and Nelson Adams, as follows, to wit: He, the said constable Elliott, paid of said proceeds to the defendant George A. Eddy seven hundred and eight dollars on the claim that he, the said George A. Eddy, claimed to represent, to wit, three claims of his own, and the claim of Gillett & Co., and the claim of Gillett, Armstrong & Kelly; and he paid to the said Nelson Adams on the claims of Myers & Myers, Adam Brewer and J. A. Blackman, one hundred and fifty dollars, and the balance he kept for his own fees and the fees of the justice of the peace; the defendant George A. Eddy was present at said sale and assisted the constable as his clerk, and received the money when paid in at said sale. Nelson Adams paid of the proceeds received by him all he received except forty dollars, to the parties for whom he received it. Eddy, Toles, Edwards and Adams signed said forthcoming bond under the belief that the attachments of Weaver & Bill and John A. Moore were void on account of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
50 cases
  • Thompson v. Simpson
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • April 19, 1910
    ... ... Loker, 1 Handy 574; Turner v. Gregory, 151 Mo ... 103; Trayer v. Wood, 96 Mo. 478; Chamberlain v ... Blodgett, 96 Mo. 483; Whelan v. Weaver, 93 Mo ... 430; Burge v. Burge, 94 Mo.App. 15; Lorie v ... Abernathy, 63 Mo.App. 248; Graton v. Land & Lbr ... Co., 189 Mo. 322; Keaton v ... 643; Hanchett v. Ives, 133 ... Ill. 332, contra, concededly against weight of authority on ... stare decisis. Moore v. Fitz, 15 Ind. 43; Eddy ... v. Weaver, 37 Kan. 540; Bank v. Reinitz, 4 ... N.Y.S. 801. So long as the lien of the attachment persists, ... claims to the property itself ... ...
  • Worrell v. Fellows
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • November 18, 1913
    ...Co. v. Grimes, 38 Kan. 241, 16 P. 472; Ryan v. Madden, 46 Kan. 245, 26 P. 679; Pelton v. Bauer, 4 Colo. App. 339, 35 P. 918; Eddy v. Weaver, 37 Kan. 540, 15 P. 492; Hill v. Bank, 42 Kan. 364, 22 P. 324. See, also, in support of this rule, Tootle, Wheeler & Motter Merc. Co. v. Floyd, 28 Okla......
  • Gaffney v. Stanard
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • March 12, 1912
    ...v. Hubble, 8 Okla. 169 ; B., K. & S. W. Ry. Co. v. Grimes, 38 Kan. 241 ; Ryan v. Madden , 26 P. 679; Pelton v. Bauer , 35 P. 918; Eddy v. Weaver, 37 Kan. 540 ; Hill v. Bank, 42 Kan. 364 ." ¶4 This defect in the case-made is called to the attention of the court by the brief of defendants in ......
  • Seibold v. City of Muskogee
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • February 9, 1932
    ...to state that the findings and judgment are contrary to the evidence. The rule was stated by the Supreme Court of Kansas in Eddy v. Weaver, 37 Kan. 540, 15 P. 492, as follows:"Usually, when a party making a case for the Supreme Court desires that it shall be shown that the case contains all......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT