Edgar Lumber Co. v. Cornie Stave Co.
Decision Date | 20 June 1910 |
Citation | 130 S.W. 452,95 Ark. 449 |
Parties | EDGAR LUMBER COMPANY v. CORNIE STAVE COMPANY |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Union Circuit Court; George W. Hays, Judge; affirmed.
STATEMENT BY THE COURT.
This suit was instituted in the Union Circuit Court by the Cornie Stave Company against the Edgar Lumber Company to recover damages in the sum of $ 972.11 for an alleged breach of contract. Both parties are corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Arkansas. The contract of June 25 1902, having expired by its own terms, this suit was brought on the second contract, which is as follows:
At the time these contracts were executed, and thereafter, the Cornie Stave Company owned and operated a stave mill at Junction City, Arkansas, on the main line of the Arkansas Southern Railroad, which commenced at El Dorado and extended south sixteen miles to Junction City, and from there into the State of Louisiana. Cornie Junction was a regular station on said railroad, about four miles north of Junction City. The town of Wesson was about four miles west of the town of Cornie Junction and from the line of the Arkansas Southern Railroad. It came into existence by reason of the location there of a sawmill plant by the H. C. McDaniel Lumber Company, a domestic corporation. A spur railroad track was constructed from Cornie Junction to Wesson for the use of the McDaniel Lumber Company in hauling its products from its mill to the main line of said railroad at Cornie Junction. For the purpose of hauling saw logs to its mill, the McDaniel Lumber Company constructed a tram or log road, some ten miles in length, extending out into its timber west of the mill. This tram road was of standard guage, and was connected with the spur track at Wesson. The McDaniel Lumber Company owned an engine, and operated it for the purpose of hauling logs on its tram road to its mill to be sawed into lumber, and also for the purpose of hauling lumber from its mill over the spur track to Cornie Junction on the main line of the Arkansas Southern Railroad Company. The cars used were obtained from the railroad company.
In the territory traversed by the tram road was valuable stave timber, some of which was owned by the Cornie Stave Company. The contract in question was executed for the purpose of having this stave timber hauled to its mill.
In the year 1904 the Edgar Lumber Company was incorporated, and during the same year purchased the entire holding of the McDaniel Lumber Company. The contract in question was then in force, and was being performed by the McDaniel Lumber Company. The Edgar Lumber Company continued the performance of the contract according to its terms for a period of time which will be stated later. On the 14th day of September 1905, articles of incorporation of the El Dorado & Wesson Railway Company were issued. The stockholders were in the main the same as those of the Edgar Lumber Company. This railroad was constructed from Wesson to El Dorado, a distance of ten miles. The steel was removed from the spur track between Wesson and Cornie Junction after the El Dorado & Wesson Railroad was finished; and some time in August, 1907, the Edgar Lumber Company ceased to use said spur track. Thereafter its cars were carried to the main line at El Dorado over the El Dorado & Wesson Railroad. The Edgar Lumber Company continued to perform the contract sued on until the 16th day of July, 1908, at which time it refused to deliver any more cars under the terms of said contract to the main line of the Rock Island Railroad, which had become the successor of the Arkansas Southern Railroad Company. During the latter part of the year 1907, and after the spur track had been torn up, the Edgar Lumber Company hauled the cars containing its lumber and the timber of the Cornie Stave Company over the line of the El Dorado & Wesson Railroad to El...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McIntyre v. Harrison
... ... [157 S.E. 506] ... his own rates and choose his own customers. Edgar Lumber ... Co. v. Cornie, 95 Ark. 449, 130 S.W. 452; Piedmont ... Mfg ... ...
-
Intyre v. Harrison
...222 U. S. 541, 32 S. Ct. 108, 56 L. Ed. 308. A private carrier can makehis own rates and choose his own customers. Edgar Lumber Co. v. Cornie, 95 Ark. 449, 130 S. W. 452; Piedmont Mfg. Co. v. Columbia R. Co., 19 S. C. 353; Brown v. Adams Express Co., 15 W. Va. 812, 820. Section 12 of this a......
-
Mullins & Kyte v. Road Improvement District No. 5
...be resolved against the party who prepared the contract--in this instance, the district. 112 Ark. 1; 115 Ark. 166. See also 88 Ark. 363; 95 Ark. 449. If the engineer thought work was being done improperly, it was his duty to reject it at once. 200 Mich. 453; 166 N.W. 904; 90 N.W. 700. Failu......
- Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. v. Coffman