Edwards Co., Inc. v. Monogram Industries, Inc., 82-2019
| Decision Date | 02 September 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-2019,82-2019 |
| Parties | EDWARDS COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONOGRAM INDUSTRIES, INC., Monotronics, Inc. and Entronic Company, Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Larry D. Knippa, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
Dan Matthews, Houston, Tex., for Monogram Industries, Inc.
Charles L. Babcock, Dallas, Tex., for amicus curiae Nat. Realty Committee, Inc.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Walter Ely, J., sitting by designation.
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion March 21, 1983, 5 Cir., 1983, 700 F.2d 994)
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Jon-T Chemicals, Inc.
...new clothes, pretend to see something which does not exist." Edwards Co. v. Monogram Industries, 700 F.2d 994, 1002, vacated, 715 F.2d 157 (1983), reversed, 730 F.2d 977 (5th Cir.1984) (en banc). In determining whether a subsidiary is the alter ego of its parent, we apply a multifactor test......
-
Edwards Co., Inc. v. Monogram Industries, Inc.
...id. at 995, notwithstanding the fact that the creditor has made no showing of fraud or injustice. We granted en banc rehearing, 715 F.2d 157 (5th Cir.1983), primarily to decide whether, under Texas law, 5 a plaintiff suing on a contract must show fraud or injustice before piercing the corpo......