Edwards v. State of South Carolina
| Decision Date | 14 May 1962 |
| Docket Number | No. 819,819 |
| Citation | Edwards v. State of South Carolina, 369 U.S. 870, 82 S.Ct. 1141, 8 L.Ed.2d 274 (1962) |
| Parties | James EDWARDS, Jr., et al, petitioners, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr. and Donald James Sampson, for petitioners.
Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen. of South Carolina, Everett N. Brandon, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. C. Coleman, Jr., for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Granted.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
28 cases
-
Mark W., Application of
... ... "[A] member of the bar of any state, district or territory of the United States, who, for five of the ... of at least five years ... " Laughlin was admitted to the bar in South Dakota in 1914. He practiced there three [491 A.2d 584] and one-half ... ...
- IBB v. LOCAL LODGE D129
-
Dominguez v. National Airlines, Inc.
... ... is wanting because plaintiff has no claim cognizable in the state courts and, therefore, derivative jurisdiction does not exist. In the ... ...
-
Kulavic v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Ry. Co.
... ... Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco R.R., 361 F.2d 946, 953 (7th Cir.1966) ... 1 In a state trial, Mr. Kulavic's supervisor was found guilty of battery ... 2 The ... ...
Get Started for Free