Edwards v. Wabash Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 18 February 1920 |
Docket Number | 138. |
Citation | 264 F. 610 |
Parties | EDWARDS, Internal Revenue Collector, v. WABASH RY. CO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Francis G. Caffey, U.S. Atty., of New York City (Vincent H. Rothwell Asst. U.S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Winslow S. Pierce, Lawrence Green, and F. C. Nicodemus, Jr., all of New York City, for defendant in error.
This cause comes here on writ of error to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The defendant in error is hereinafter called plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error is hereinafter called defendant.
The plaintiff sues to recover the amount of stamp taxes demanded under the War Revenue Act of 1917 (40 Stat. 300), which it paid under protest. The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Indiana. The amount of the original capital stock is fixed at $143,460,000, and the number of shares into which the capital is to be divided is fixed at 1,434,600 shares, of the par value of $100 each. Of such capital stock, 462,000 shares, it is provided in the certificate of incorporation, shall be issued as 5 per cent profit-sharing preferred stock A, 499,700 shares shall be issued as 5 per cent. convertible preferred stock B, and 472,900 shares shall be issued as common stock.
The certificate of incorporation also provided that the
The certificates of stock contained the following:
The plaintiff prior to October 3, 1917, issued its capital stock in the par amount of $138,486,312.71, of which $46,200,000 was classified as five per cent. profit-sharing preferred stock A, $48,725,578.18 was classified as five per cent. convertible preferred stock B, and $43,559,743.43 was classified as common stock. Thereafter and on March 27, 1918, the board of directors adopted the following resolution:
'Resolved, that the proper officers of this company be and they are hereby authorized and directed to execute certificates for five per cent. profit-sharing preferred stock A and common stock of this company and to deliver and cause the same to be delivered in proper proportions, with a proper adjustment of declared and unpaid dividends, to holders of certificates for shares of this company's five per cent. convertible preferred stock B, who, at any time after August 1, 1918, and up to thirty days prior to any date fixed for the redemption of the entire issue of five per cent. profit-sharing preferred stock A, shall surrender the same for conversion into and exchange for five per cent. profit-sharing preferred stock A and common stock on the terms provided and set forth in this company's certificate of incorporation and in the certificates for its five per cent. convertible preferred stock B.'
The plaintiff, between August 2, 1918, and October 30, 1918 executed and delivered certificates representing...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Associated Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. United States
...1923, 263 U.S. 179, 187-188, 44 S.Ct. 69, 68 L.Ed. 240; Haiku Sugar Co. v. Johnstone, 9 Cir., 1918, 249 F. 103; Edwards v. Wabash Ry. Co., 2 Cir., 1920, 264 F. 610. In attempting to sustain its position, the plaintiff asserts that the effect of the language of Sections 316, 901 and 902 uneq......
-
Burk-Waggoner Oil Ass'n v. Hopkins
...that the Executive Department had placed on its act. Fisk v. Henarie, 142 U.S. 459, 12 Sup.Ct. 207, 35 L.Ed. 1080; Edwards v. Wabash Co. (C.C.A.) 264 F. 610. It is contended that this construction gives an unconstitutional tinge to the act. As, for instance, when such a tax is imposed upon ......
-
Fralick v. Guyer
... ... v. United States, 252 U.S. 140, ... 40 S.Ct. 237, 64 L.Ed. 496; Heald v. Dist. Col., 254 ... U.S. 20, 42 S.Ct. 434, 65 L.Ed. 34; Edwards v. Wabash ... Ry., 264 F. 610; vol. 2, pp. 1108, 1109, Proceedings and ... Debates, Constitutional Convention, 1889.) ... James & ... ...
-
Waterman-Bic Pen Corporation v. United States
...Saving Bank v. United States, 19 Wall. 227, 86 U.S. 227 (1873); Ardsley Club v. Durey, 40 F.2d 293 (N. D.N.Y.1930); Edwards v. Wabash Ry. Co., 264 F. 610 (2 Cir. 1920). The adoption by Congress of the amendment of September 14, 1960 by which readjustments for local advertising were specific......