Eeoc v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton & Scripps, 00-57222.
| Decision Date | 07 February 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 01-55321.,D.C. No. CV-00-01322-FMC.,No. 00-57222.,00-57222.,01-55321. |
| Citation | 319 F.3d 1091 |
| Parties | EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LUCE, FORWARD & HAMILTON, & SCRIPPS, Defendant-Appellant. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
1. Judge Fisher was recused.
To continue reading
Request your trial
25 cases
-
E.E.O.C. v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps
...illegal retaliation. Id. Because of the importance of the issue, we agreed to rehear this case en banc. EEOC v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps, 319 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2003). While we disagree with Luce Forward II's conclusion that Circuit City implicitly overruled Duffield, we need no......
-
Wilson v. Union Security Life Ins. Co.
... ... the party who carries the burden come forward with evidence, but it has the significant ... ...
- Murphy v. Amazon.com, Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-01577-LJO-BAM
- Nguyen v. 3m Co.
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 9
.... EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, 303 F.3d 994, 997, 89 F.E.P. Cases 1134 (9th Cir. 2002), vacated, rehearing en banc granted 319 F.3d 1091, 90 F.E.P. Cases 1856 (9th Cir. 2003), modified 345 F.3d 742, 92 F.E.P. Cases 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).[136] . EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton &......