Eidson v. State, 7 Div. 313

Decision Date11 October 1955
Docket Number7 Div. 313
Citation82 So.2d 814,38 Ala.App. 321
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
PartiesHoward Boyce EIDSON v. STATE.

E. L. Roberts, Gadsden, for appellant.

John Patterson, Atty. Gen., and Robt. Straub, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.

In this case a judgment of guilty was entered on 12 March 1954, and sentence was imposed on 18 March 1954.

No motion for a new trial was made, and an appeal was taken on 18 March 1954, the date of sentence.

The transcript of the evidence was filed with the circuit clerk on 15 September 1954, some five months and twenty-seven days after the appeal day.

The State has filed a motion to strike the transcript of the evidence because not filed in accordance with law.

This identical point was before us in the case of Clark v. State, Ala.App., 82 So.2d 805, and the principles therein enunciated are governing of, and decisive of, the State's motion to strike the transcript in this case.

The State's motion to strike is granted upon the authority of Clark v. State, supra.

The record proper being in all things regular this cause is due to be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Motion to strike transcript of evidence granted, and cause affirmed.

Affirmed.

BONE, J., recuses self.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • White v. City of Birmingham
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • December 13, 1960
    ...84, 94 So.2d 415; McDaniel v. State, 39 Ala.App. 157, 96 So.2d 319; Clark v. State, 38 Ala.App. 305, 82 So.2d 805; Eidson v. State, 38 Ala.App. 321, 82 So.2d 814; Relf v. State, 267 Ala. 3, 99 So.2d The judgment entry recites: '* * * and the defendant files motion to quash, and said motion ......
  • Coggins v. State, 7 Div. 542
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • January 6, 1959
    ...The motion of the Attorney General is well taken and is hereby granted. Clark v. State, 38 Ala.App. 305, 82 So.2d 805; Eidson v. State, 38 Ala.App. 321, 82 So.2d 814; Relf v. State, 267 Ala. 3, 99 So.2d The record proper is in all things regular. This judgment is therefore due to be affirme......
  • Meadows v. State, 7 Div. 370
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • October 11, 1955
  • Thomason v. State, 4 Div. 336
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • March 5, 1957
    ...and Paul T. Gish, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. CATES, Judge. Transcript of evidence stricken; judgment affirmed. Eidson v. State, Ala.App., 82 So.2d 814. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT