Eisenlohr v. Swain et al.

Decision Date01 January 1859
PartiesEisenlohr versus Swain et al.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

What was said by the judge at Nisi Prius, was a sufficient answer to the plaintiff's demand for speculative damages in this case. The defendants having failed, through mistake or accident, and without fraud, to publish the plaintiff's notice according to contract, he was entitled to recover back the advertising fee he had paid, and that the verdict gave him.

The judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Hooks Smelting Company v. Planters' Compress Company
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1904
    ...N. C. 689, s. c. 24 Pittsb. L. J. 19, s. c. 33 Leg. Int. 322; 48 Pa. 309; 51 Pa. 165; 2 Del. 60, 247; 71 Pa. 350; 65 Pa. 199; 91 Pa.St. 92; 35 Pa. 107; 135 Pa.St. 132, s. c. 19 A. 1008; 48 Pa. s. c. 13 Pittsb. L. J. 173. M. L. Stephenson, and Jno. J. & E. C. Hornor, for appellee. There was ......
  • Winston Cigarette Mach. Co v. Wells-whitehead Tobacco Co
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 8, 1906
    ...of exact ascertainment or of being proved with reasonable certainty. We are unable to distinguish the two cases. So in Eisenlohr v. Swain. 35 Pa. 107, 78 Am. Dec. 328, where the defendants had failed to advertise a sale as they had contracted to do, it was held that the plaintiff could not ......
  • Winston Cigarette Mach. Co. v. Wells-Whitehead Tobacco Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 8, 1906
    ...of exact ascertainment or of being proved with reasonable certainty. We are unable to distinguish the two cases. So in Eisenlohr v. Swain, 35 Pa. 107, 78 Am. Dec. 328, where the defendants had failed to advertise a sale as they had contracted to do, it was held that the plaintiff could not ......
  • Shealy's, Inc. v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TEL. CO., Civ. A. No. 3324.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • November 24, 1954
    ...is most uncertain, and the circuit court was correct in holding that such damages were not recoverable." See also Eisenlohr v. Swain, 1860, 35 Pa. 107, 78 Am.Dec. 328. In Winston Cigarette Mach. Co. v. Wells-Whitehead Tobacco Co., 1906, 141 N.C. 284, 53 S.E. 885, 889, 8 L.R.A., N.S., 255, t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT