Elder v. Williams
| Docket Number | 19SC1009 |
| Decision Date | 21 December 2020 |
Timothy Williams began working at the El Paso County, Colorado Sheriff’s Office in 2002 and, after multiple promotions over the course of his career, reached the rank of lieutenant. In March 2016, Sheriff Bill Elder ordered a mandatory survey requesting, among other things, retirement eligibility dates from all employees. Williams, who then would have been eligible for full retirement benefits June 1, 2018, completed this survey and reported that he expected to retire within the next five years. Thereafter, Williams was assigned to a team that conducted investigations into alleged misconduct by personnel in his office. Apparently...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
45 cases
-
Castro v. People
... ... to the concept of relying on a body of one’s peers to determine guilt or innocence as a safeguard against arbitrary law enforcement." Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 87, 90 S.Ct. 1893, 26 L.Ed.2d 446 (1970). Accompanying this hallowed tradition is the right in felony cases to a fair and ... Id. ; see also Elder v. Williams, 2020 CO 88, ¶ 18, 477 P.3d 694, 698 ("A statute is ambiguous when it is reasonably susceptible of multiple interpretations."). ¶35 ... ...
-
State ex rel. Weiser v. Ctr. for Excellence in Higher Educ., Inc.
... ... Id. ¶ 35 Colorado courts apply a three-part analysis to distinguish between a change and a clarification. Williams v. Dep't of Pub. Safety , 2015 COA 180, ¶¶ 92-93, 369 P.3d 760. First, a court considers whether the prior version of the statute was ambiguous; ... We must avoid constructions that would render any words or phrases superfluous or lead to illogical or absurd results. Elder v. Williams , 2020 CO 88, ¶ 18, 477 P.3d 694. ¶ 94 If the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, we apply it as written and look no ... ...
-
West-Helmle v. Denver Distrct Attorneys Office
... ... addressed whether claims brought under the Colorado ... Anti-Discrimination Act (“CADA”) are barred by ... the CGIA. Elder v. Williams , 477 P.3d 694 (Colo ... 2020). In Elder , the Colorado Supreme Court ... concluded that CADA claims for compensatory ... ...
-
State v. 5 Star Feedlot, Inc.
... ... Elder v. Williams, 2020 CO 88, ¶ 18, 477 P.3d 694, 698. If the statute is unambiguous—i.e., if it is not reasonably susceptible to multiple ... ...
Get Started for Free
