Electronic Modules Corp. v. U.S., 179-77
| Decision Date | 07 March 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 179-77,179-77 |
| Citation | 702 F.2d 218 |
| Parties | ELECTRONIC MODULES CORPORATION, Appellee, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellant. Appeal |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit |
Harry D. Shapiro, Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
Robert S. Watkins, Court of Claims Section, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and FRIEDMAN and RICH, Circuit Judges.
The appellee seeks, under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2412 (Supp. V 1981) (the Act), attorney's fees and other expenses incurred in an appeal from a judgment of the United States Claims Court in an income tax refund suit in which it prevailed. The principal issue on the appeal was whether advances the appellee made to its wholly owned subsidiary were loans or equity investments. The United States Claims Court held that they were loans and that the appellee therefore was entitled to a bad-debt deduction on the loss it incurred when it subsequently liquidated the subsidiary. We affirmed. Electronic Modules Corp. v. United States, 695 F.2d 1367 (C.A.Fed.1982).
The Act provides for the awarding of attorney's fees against the United States in circumstances here met "unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified." 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2412(d)(1)(A). The "position of the United States" is the position it took in the judicial proceedings in which the attorney's fees were incurred. Broad Avenue Laundry & Tailoring v. United States, 693 F.2d 1387 (Fed.Cir.1982). In this case the appellee seeks attorney's fees covering only the government's unsuccessful appeal from the decision of the Claims Court. The inquiry under the Act therefore is whether the government was substantially justified in taking the appeal.
We find that the government was substantially justified.
The appellee points out that although the court held that the determination whether particular advances were debt or equity turned largely upon the facts of the case, the government's appeal did not challenge any of the Claims Court's factual findings which formed the basis for that court's determination that the advances were loans. That fact, however, does not establish that the government's position was not substantially justified. The government's principal argument was that the Claims Court failed to consider a major factor in determining the debt-or-equity issue or that, if it considered the factor, it failed to give the factor sufficient weight. Although we rejected the argument, the government acted reasonably in making it. See Broad Avenue, supra; Gava v. United States, 699 F.2d 1367 (C.A.Fed.1983). As our opinion in the present case indicated, the decision of that...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Iowa Exp. Distribution, Inc. v. N.L.R.B.
...2,116 Boxes of Boned Beef, supra, 726 F.2d at 1487; Spencer v. NLRB, 712 F.2d 539, 556-57 (D.C.Cir.1983); Electronic Modules Corp. v. United States, 702 F.2d 218, 219 (Fed.Cir.1983). Other courts have held that the government position referred to in the EAJA is the underlying governmental a......
-
Ellis v. U.S.
...wholly reasonable positions in other facets of the case. See Goldhaber, supra, 698 F.2d at 196-97; cf. Electronic Modules Corp. v. United States, 702 F.2d 218, 219-20 (Fed.Cir.1983). In the light of these guidelines, we think that the trial judge erred in denying counsel fees to appellant f......
-
U.S. v. Gavilan Joint Community College Dist.
...NLRB, 712 F.2d 539, 556 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 936, 104 S.Ct. 1908, 80 L.Ed.2d 457 (1984); Electronic Modules Corp. v. United States, 702 F.2d 218, 219 (Fed.Cir.1983). Other courts construed the language to include the conduct of the Government giving rise to the litigation.......
-
Rawlings v. Heckler
...the government's litigation posture. See, e.g., Spencer v. N.L.R.B., 712 F.2d 539, 556 (D.C.Cir.1983); Electronic Modules Corp. v. United States, 702 F.2d 218, 219 (Fed.Cir.1983). Other courts follow the "underlying action" theory, which focuses on the governmental action that precipitated ......