Elfbrandt v. Russell, 553
Decision Date | 15 June 1964 |
Docket Number | No. 553,M,553 |
Parties | Barbara ELFBRANDT v. Imogene R. RUSSELL et al. isc |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
W. Edward Morgan, for petitioner.
Robert W. Pickrell, Atty. Gen. of Arizona, Philip M. Haggerty, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Norman E. Green, for respondents.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona for further consideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, 84 S.Ct. 1316.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Elfbrandt v. Russell, 656
...remanded the cause for reconsideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, 84 S.Ct. 1316, 12 L.Ed.2d 377. See 378 U.S. 127, 84 S.Ct. 1658, 12 L.Ed.2d 744. On reconsideration the Supreme Court of Arizona reinstated the original judgment. 97 Ariz. 140, 397 P.2d 944. The case is here......
-
Monroe v. Trustees of the California State Colleges
... ... a timely challenge to his exclusion or discharge from public employment (see, e.g., Elfbrandt v. Russell (1963) 94 Ariz. 1, 381 P.2d 554, vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of ... ...
-
State v. Cota
...rights of free speech and press. Elfbrandt v. Russell, 94 Ariz. 1, 381 P.2d 554, judgment vacated on other grounds 378 U.S. 127, 84 S.Ct. 1658, 12 L.Ed.2d 744, reinstated 97 Ariz. 140, 397 P.2d From the above discussion it follows that the unconstitutionality of A.R.S. § 13-532, the obscene......