Eliott v. Gower

Decision Date02 March 1878
Citation12 R.I. 79
PartiesGEORGE C. ELIOTT v. GEORGE L. GOWER et als.
CourtRhode Island Supreme Court

The separate equitable estate of a married woman is subject to an equitable charge for her individual contracts in favor of her creditors.

If a married woman declares expressly and in writing her intention to charge her separate equitable estate, or if she so declares verbally and her contract is for the benefit of herself or her separate estate, the charge will be valid.

BILL IN EQUITY brought against the respondent, Gower, his wife, and the Rhode Island Hospital Trust Company, as trustee for Mrs Gower, in order to establish a charge on certain trust funds in the possession of the company, for the payment of a debt alleged to have been contracted by the respondent, Mrs Gower, in 1871, under her then name of Perry.

June 2 1869, Mrs. Gower, then Mrs. Frances L. Perry, conveyed to the above named company, her husband joining in the deed of conveyance, certain property, " In trust to take immediate or absolute possession and control of the same, to hold, manage, dispose of, convey, invest, and reinvest the same in their discretion; " the deed then prescribes certain payments to be made from the trust fund, after which the deed proceeds: " And subject to the above, to pay the rents, profits, and income of the same as they may accrue to the said Frances L. Perry, or her order, upon her sole and separate receipt therefor, and also to pay to her upon a like receipt for the benefit of the said Frances L. Perry and her family, of whomsoever that family may consist, whenever, in the opinion of said trustees, the Rhode Island Hospital Trust Company, something more than the rents, profits, and income may be necessary for her comfort and happiness, by reason of increased expenses from sickness or other causes, or by reason of suspen sion, or diminution of rents, profits, and income, or for any other necessary cause, such portions of the principal, from time to time, as they may think proper, not to exceed in all the one half part thereof. And in case of the decease of the said Frances, this trust to cease and terminate, and the said property remaining in the hands of the trustees to be conveyed as she shall by last will and testament direct, and in default thereof to her heirs at law. Intending to give said trustees absolute and complete control over said property, subject, however, to the trusts and conditions herein named."

The respondents demurred.

Tillinghast & Ely, for complainant.

George Lewis Gower, for respondents.

POTTER J.

Certain property was conveyed to trustees, who after paying certain debts and expenses were to pay over to Mrs. Gower, then Mrs. Perry, the rents and income of the property as they accrued, or to pay them to her order on her sole and separate receipt. The trustees were also empowered in their discretion to apply to her use a portion of the principal. On her decease the trust was to end, and the property remaining to be conveyed as she should by will direct, and in default thereof to her heirs at law. The instrument of conveyance contained the clause, " intending to give to said trustees absolute and complete control over said property, subject, however, to the trusts and conditions herein named."

The bill alleges that May 3, 1871, Mrs. Perry being indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $780.25, for goods received by her, and work and labor done for her, and at her request, gave the complainant an order in writing on the respondent, the R.I. Hospital Trust Company, for that amount, which was presented, and payment demanded and refused, although, as alleged, the said Trust Company had received more than enough of said income to pay it.

And the bill further alleges that between May and June, 1871, Mrs Perry became further indebted to the complainant for goods purchased and received by her in the sum of $505.75, and promised the complainant to pay him the same out of said trust estate and the income thereof, and that the said respondent Trust Company had notice thereof. This...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Cartan, McCarthy & Co. v. David
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • April 1, 1884
    ...83 N. Y. 338; Emerson v. Clayton, 32 Ill. 496; Pomeroy v. Man. Ins. Co., 40 Ill. 399, 402; Williams v. Hugunin, 69 Ill. 214; Elliott v. Gower, 12 R. I. 79; Davis v. Bank of Cheyenne, 5 Neb., 242; Kansas Manf. Co. v. Gandy, 11 Neb. 448; Priest v. Cone, 51 Vt. 495; Collins v. Dawley, 4 Col. 1......
  • Heal v. Niagara Oil Co.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • May 18, 1898
    ...a lease in which the husband did not join, unlike a deed of conveyance, may be confirmed after the husband's death. See, also, Eliott v. Gower, 12 R. I. 79; McKesson v. Stanton, 50 Wis. 297, 6 N. W. 881;Krouskop v. Shontz, 51 Wis. 204, 8 N. W. 241; Williams v. Urmston, 25 Ohio St. 296. Leas......
  • Dean v. Rounds
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Supreme Court
    • July 12, 1893
    ...equivalent for the loan. See, also, Bank v. Greene, 14 R. I. 1; Barrows v. Keene, 15 R. I. 484, 8 Atl. Rep. 713, and cases cited; Eliott v. Gower, 12 R. I. 79; Livingston v. Livingston, 2 Johns. Ch. 537; 2 Bish. Mar. Worn. § 360, and cases cited in note 1. The cases of Angell v. McCullough,......
  • Flaum v. Wallace
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 29, 1889
    ... ... 572, which is an able and exhaustive ... review of all the authorities upon the subject; Hall v ... Eccleston, 37 Md. 510; Eliott v. Gower, 12 R.I ... 79; Woodson v. Perkins, 5 Grat. 345; Heburn v ... Warner, 112 Mass. 271; Williams v. Hugunin, 69 ... Ill. 214; Willard v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT