Elliot v. Nyack Hosp.

• Decision Date: 26 May 1994
• Citation: Elliot v. Nyack Hosp., 612 N.Y.S.2d 271, 204 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
• Parties: Morton B. ELLIOT et al., Appellants, v. NYACK HOSPITAL et al., Defendants, and Mark Fagelman, Respondent.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Page 271

612 N.Y.S.2d 271

204 A.D.2d 958

Morton B. ELLIOT et al., Appellants, v. NYACK HOSPITAL et al., Defendants and Mark Fagelman, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Department.

May 26, 1994.

Lawrence Bernstein (Alexander Wulwick, of counsel), New York City, for appellants.

Schiavetti, De Vito, Begos & Nicholson (Padraic D. Lee, of counsel), White Plains, for respondent.

Before CARDONA, P.J., and WHITE, CASEY, WEISS and PETERS, JJ.

WHITE, Justice.

Appeal (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from an order of the Supreme Court (Meehan, J.), entered April 29, 1992 in Rockland County, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision, inter alia, denying plaintiffs' motion to restore this action to the trial calendar.

The trial of this medical malpractice action was adjourned on three occasions in 1990 due to plaintiffs' inability to procure an expert witness. On the third occasion, Supreme Court marked the case off the calendar. One year later, plaintiffs moved to restore it. Supreme Court denied the motion and, on reconsideration, adhered to its original decision. This appeal ensued.

We affirm. To prevail on a CPLR 3404 motion, the movant must demonstrate the merits of the case, a reasonable excuse for the delay, the absence of an intent to abandon the matter and the lack of prejudice to the nonmoving party in the event the case is restored to the trial calendar (see, Civello v. Grossman, 192 A.D.2d 636, 596 N.Y.S.2d 464). In our opinion, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in this instance because the affidavit of merit of plaintiffs' physician is wholly insufficient as it does not make specific observations as to the procedures or treatments performed or the alleged improprieties therein (see, Nepomniaschi v. Goldstein, 182 A.D.2d...