Elliott v. Cale

Decision Date29 February 1888
Citation16 N.E. 390,113 Ind. 383
PartiesElliott v. Cale et al.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from superior court, Marion county.

On petition to rehear Elliott v. Cale, 14 N. E. Rep. 708.

F. Winter and Rand & Winters, for appellant. Claypool & Ketcham, for appellees.

Zollars, J.

In response to the petition and argument for a rehearing in this cause, we deem it sufficient to say that all of the difficulties pointed out by counsel as necessary to be met in the practical application of the act of 1875, in the various cases that may arise, were considered upon the hearing. Nothing was written especially upon the questions now suggested, because their formal decision was not necessary to a decision of the case before the court. It was then and is now thought best not to write upon those questions until a case shall be presented in which they shall be so directly involved as that their decision shall be necessary and proper to a proper disposition of the case. Petition for rehearing overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Egbert v. Egbert
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • March 21, 1956
    ... ... Gaylord [1876], 53 Ind. 365; Davis v. Krug [1883], 95 Ind. 1, 9; Foregerson v. Smith [1885], 104 Ind. 246, 247, 3 N.E. 866; Elliott v. Cale [1888], 113 Ind. 383, 406, 14 N.E. 708 [16 N.E. 390]; Wine v. Woods [1902], 158 Ind. 388, 391, 63 N.E. 759; Buehner Chair Co. v. Feulner ... ...
  • Wachstetter v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • April 22, 1915
    ...in one-third thereof in the event she survive her husband. Taylor v. Stockwell, 66 Ind. 505;Elliott v. Cole, 113 Ind. 383, 14 N. E. 708, 16 N. E. 390;Geisendorff v. Cobbs, 47 Ind. App. 573, 94 N. E. 236. We must therefore look to the law in force at the time of the sale, and during the time......
  • Wachstetter v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • April 22, 1915
    ...thereof in the event she survives her husband. Taylor v. Stockwell (1879), 66 Ind. 505; Elliott v. Cale (1888), 113 Ind. 383, 14 N.E. 708, 16 N.E. 390; Geisendorff v. (1911), 47 Ind.App. 573, 94 N.E. 236. We must therefore, look to the law in force at the time of the sale, and during the ti......
  • Territory of Arizona v. Delinquent Tax List of Apache County for 1887
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1889
    ...P. 396; Sauls v. Freeman, 24 Fla. 225, 4 So. 577; Hannan v. Grizzard, 99 N.C. 161, 6 S.E. 93; Elliott v. Cale, 113 Ind. 383, 14 N.E. 708, 16 N.E. 390; Shreveport v. Holmes, 125 694, 8 S.Ct. 1389. However, after a careful consideration of the case, we must adhere to our decision rendered. Ou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT