Ellis v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Decision Date14 July 1881
Citation8 F. 81
PartiesELLIS, Adm'x, etc., v. CONNECTICUT MUT. LIFE INS. CO.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Connecticut

Wm. L Royall, for plaintiff.

Henry C. Robinson, for defendant.

SHIPMAN D.J.

This is an action at law upon a judgment rendered by the circuit court of the city of Fredericksburg, in the state of Virginia. The defendant made no appearance in that court, and defends here upon the ground that it was never served with process, and that the court of Virginia had no jurisdiction. By written stipulation of the parties a jury was waived, and the case was tried by the court upon an agreed statement of facts.

In 1852 the defendant, a Connecticut corporation, insured the life of Lewis Ellis, a citizen of Virginia, for the sum of $3,000 upon consideration that it should be annually paid thenceforth, and to the end of his life, a specified premium of insurance. No premiums were paid after June 28, 1860. Before that date they had been duly paid. Said Ellis died in the year 1869.

In the year 1856 the general assembly of Virginia passed a statute providing, in substance, as follows:

Section 1. Be it enacted by the general assembly, that no life insurance company, unless incorporated by the legislature of this commonwealth, shall make any contracts of life insurance within this state until such insurance company shall have complied with the provisions of this act.

Sec. 2. Every such insurance company shall, by a written power of attorney, appoint some citizen of this commonwealth resident therein its agent or attorney, who shall accept service of all lawful processes against such company in this commonwealth, and cause an appearance to be entered in any action in like manner as if such corporation had existed and been duly served with process within this state.

Sec. 3. A copy of such power of attorney, duly certified and authenticated, shall be filed with the auditor of public accounts of this commonwealth, and copies thereof, duly certified by said auditor, shall be received in evidence in all courts of this commonwealth.

Sec. 4. If any such agent or attorney shall die or resign or be removed, it shall be the duty of such corporation to make a new appointment, as aforesaid and file a copy with the said auditor of public accounts, as above prescribed, so that at all times, and while any liability remains outstanding on such insurance, there shall be within this state an attorney authorized, as aforesaid and no such power of attorney shall be revoked until after a like power shall have been given to some competent person, and a copy thereof filed, as aforesaid.

The sixth section provided that if any insurance company should make insurance without complying with the requisites of the act, the contract should be valid, but the agent of such company should be liable to a penalty.

In 1856 the defendant duly appointed A. A. Little, of Fredericksburg, its agent, with authority to accept service of process. The agency was subject in terms to be revocable at the pleasure of the company, but this right of revocation was set out in terms only in the agreement between the company and Little. He continued to act as its agent until the beginning of the war of the rebellion, but did not so act afterwards with its knowledge or consent. Immediately after the war, the defendant informed Little that his agency had been revoked by the war, and in the spring of 1866 it formally revoked any agency. The defendant has done no business in Virginia since 1861. In 1866 it examined the question of the expediency of resuming business therein, and in consequence of certain legislation which had taken place abandoned the idea. Little died in the year 1876, and C. W. Edrington duly became his administrator.

In 1877 the legislature of Virginia passed a statute amending sections 22 and 32 of chapter 36 of the Code of 1873. Section 22 was section 4 of the act of 1856, and was amended so as to read as follows:

'If any such agent or attorney shall die, or become insane, or remove without this state, or resign, or be removed, it shall be the duty of such
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT