Ellis v. State
Decision Date | 01 September 2022 |
Docket Number | Court of Appeals Case No. 22A-CR-868 |
Citation | 194 N.E.3d 1205 |
Parties | Darla J. ELLIS, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
194 N.E.3d 1205
Darla J. ELLIS, Appellant-Defendant,
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff
Court of Appeals Case No. 22A-CR-868
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
FILED September 1, 2022
Attorney for Appellant: Justin R. Wall, Wall Legal Services, Huntington, Indiana
Attorneys for Appellee: Theodore E. Rokita, Attorney General of Indiana, Ellen H. Meilaender, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana
May, Judge.
[1] Darla J. Ellis appeals following her conviction of Level 6 felony stalking.1 Ellis raises four issues for our review, which we revise and restate as:
1. Whether the trial court properly denied Ellis's motion for change of venue;
2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Ellis's tendered preliminary jury instruction regarding the First Amendment;
3. Whether Ellis's conduct was protected by the freedom of speech guarantees provided in the United States and Indiana Constitutions; and
4. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support Ellis's conviction of stalking.
We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[3] Toward the end of Stoffel's second term as sheriff, Stoffel noticed Ellis "yelling and screaming out the window at [him], flipping [him] off, yelling obscenities, things like that." (Tr. Vol. II at 103.) This behavior continued even after Stoffel left his position as sheriff, and Stoffel explained that "it really, really started being evident and frequent in 2020." (Id. at 104.) When Stoffel was teaching, his lunch period began at 10:40 a.m., and Ellis would drive by the school at that time to yell and make obscene gestures toward Stoffel. Stoffel described Ellis's behavior as "relentless." (Id. at 128.) He testified these encounters would occur "sometimes every day ... sometimes every two or three days." (Id. at 107.) When Ellis yelled at Stoffel, "[h]er neck was bulged out and mad, angry, screaming. You know, just very, very angry and upset." (Id. at 104.) The behavior became so frequent that Stoffel modified his lunch routine to minimize having to go outside during that period. In addition to teaching, Stoffel also purchased and renovated properties. James Zahn, a self-employed excavator, was assisting Stoffel at a renovation site in August or September of 2020, when he saw Ellis stopped at a nearby stoplight. Ellis was "blowing the horn and stuck her arm out and gave [Stoffel] the finger. And said, ‘Fuck you, Terry,’ stuff like, ‘I hate you.’ " (Id. at 146.)
[4] In November 2020, Stoffel won election to serve as a Huntington County Commissioner. On December 31, 2020, Ellis sent a Facebook message to Detective Malcolm Jones of the Huntington County Sheriff's Department. The message included two photographs with the script "Nepotism continues in Huntington!!" superimposed over the photographs. (State's Ex. 1.) The message also included a third photograph with "You know who needs to get
[194 N.E.3d 1212
slapped with a Twisted Tea? Fucking Terry Stoffel" superimposed over a photograph of Stoffel. (Id. ) Detective Jones blocked Ellis from being able to contact him by Facebook Messenger, and he utilized a popular internet search engine to ascertain that Ellis's comment was a reference to a viral video of one man hitting another man in the face with a can of Twisted Tea at an Ohio convenience store.2 Detective Jones informed Stoffel about the message he received from Ellis.
[6] On March 29, 2021, Ellis drove past Lieutenant James Horne of the Huntington County Sheriff's Department while Lieutenant Horne was conducting a traffic stop near the courthouse. Ellis was "laying on her horn, gesturing at her back windshield." (Id. at 186.) In the back windshield was a sign that said, "Fuck Terry Stoffel." (Id. at 190.) A few days later, while Lieutenant Horne was speaking with a citizen on the citizen's front yard, Ellis "drove by, beeped her horn, gesturing ... [because] she wanted [Lieutenant Horne] to see her message on the back of her car." (Id. at 187.)
[7] Around this time, Stoffel reported Ellis's behavior to Huntington County Prosecutor Amy Richison, which led to Detective Robert Smith of the Indiana State Police initiating an investigation into Ellis's behavior toward Stoffel. Detective Smith interviewed Ellis, and Ellis told him she was angry that Stoffel transported her to jail rather than to a doctor's office in 2008. In addition, Ellis explained she was upset Stoffel did not appear to take seriously a complaint she made to him in the 1990s about a tanning salon employee rubbing a dirty cleaning towel in her face. She characterized Stoffel as "a piece of shit." (Id. at 200.) She also confirmed "flip[ing] him off," honking, and yelling obscenities at Stoffel. (Id. at 201.) On April 30, 2021, the State charged Ellis with one count of Level 6 felony stalking and one count of Level 6 felony intimidation.3
[8] On May 13, 2021, Ellis filed a verified motion for change of venue. She asserted:
Defendant will be unlikely to receive a fair trial due to local prejudice or bias regarding a party (victim) former elected Huntington County Sheriff, a current Huntington County elected Commissioner and has a huge array of voters, friends, employees, and connections the victim has in the county. The victim was
[194 N.E.3d 1213
also a former Huntington Police Officer that had contact with Defendant.
(App. Vol. II at 68) (errors in original). The trial court held a hearing on Ellis's motion on June 28, 2021, and the court denied the motion. However, the trial court stated it would summon more prospective jurors than the court typically does when trying a Level 6 felony case because of Stoffel's public status. On October 1, 2021, Ellis tendered a proposed preliminary jury instruction regarding the State's duty to prove Ellis was not merely engaged in activity protected by the First Amendment. The State objected to the instruction on the basis that it was an impermissible constitutional challenge. After a hearing on October 4, 2021, the trial court...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hernandez-Zuluaga v. State
... ... give a specific unanimity instruction constitutes fundamental ... error. Instructing the jury lies solely within the discretion ... of the trial court, and we will reverse only upon an abuse of ... that discretion. Ellis v. State, 194 N.E.3d 1205, ... 1214 (Ind.Ct.App. 2022), trans. denied. In order to ... conclude the trial court abused its discretion, this Court ... must find that the instructions taken as a whole misstate the ... law or otherwise mislead the jury. Proffit v. State, ... ...