Ellison v. Fry
| Docket Number | SC93760 |
| Decision Date | 19 August 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
71 cases
-
Magner v. Brinkman
... ... PriceRite Fuel, Inc., 24 A.3d 81, 85 (Me.2011) ; Aroma Wines & Equip., Inc. v. Columbian Distrib. Servs., Inc., 497 Mich. 337, 871 N.W.2d 136, 140 (2015) ; Isaac v. Vy Thanh Ho, 825 N.W.2d 379, 383 (Minn.2013) ; Ill. Cent. R.R. Co. v. Brent, 133 So.3d 760, 767 (Miss.2013) ; Ellison v. Fry, 437 S.W.3d 762, 768 (Mo.2014) (en banc); Barile v. Butte High Sch., 372 Mont. 1, 309 P.3d 1009, 1012 (2013) ; FGA, Inc. v. Giglio, 278 P.3d 490, 500 (Nev.2012) ; McNeill v. Burlington Res. Oil & Gas Co., 143 N.M. 740, 182 P.3d 121, 130 (2008) ; Minto Grain, LLC v. Tibert, 776 ... ...
-
Kitchin v. Bridgeton Landfill, LLC
... ... E.g. , Elam v. Alcolac, Inc. , 765 S.W.2d 42 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988) (nuisance, negligence); Kansas City v. W.R. Grace & Co. , 778 S.W.2d 264 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989) (negligence, strict liability, civil conspiracy), abrogated on other grounds by Ellison v. Fry , 437 S.W.3d 762 (Mo. banc 2014). Plaintiffs do not cite CERCLA as a basis for their claims; nor do they seek reimbursement of response costs or any other form of relief available under its provisions. Moreover, CERCLA does not completely preempt plaintiffs' claims or otherwise foreclose ... ...
-
Kelley v. Dep't of Corr.
... ... Ahmed, 364 S.W.3d 195, 208 (Mo. banc 2012). "Where reasonable minds can differ on the question before the jury, this Court will not disturb the jurys verdict." Williams, 281 S.W.3d at 866. Whether the plaintiff made a submissible case is a question of law that we review de novo. Ellison v. Fry, 437 S.W.3d 762, 768 (Mo. banc 2014). Analysis [810] The MHRA prohibits an employer from discriminating against an individual with respect to "compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of such individual's sex." Section 213.055.1(l)(a). "To prevail on a ... ...
-
Trs. of Clayton Terrace Subdivision v. 6 Clayton Terrace, LLC
... ... St. Johns Mercy Med. Ctr., 30 S.W.3d 848, 862 (Mo. App. 2000) , abrogated on other grounds by Ellison v. Fry, 437 S.W.3d 762, 770 (Mo. banc 2014). Whether they won or lost on the "right of first refusal" provision, and regardless of their primary motive for seeking to enforce the indentures they were charged with following, the trustees cannot be found to have abused process when they used the ... ...
Get Started for Free