Ellmaker v. Kansas, 09–9480.
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Citation | 560 U.S. 966,177 L.Ed.2d 326,130 S.Ct. 3410 (Mem) |
| Docket Number | No. 09–9480.,09–9480. |
| Parties | Andrew Ramey ELLMAKER, petitioner, v. KANSAS. |
| Decision Date | 14 June 2010 |
560 U.S. 966
130 S.Ct. 3410 (Mem)
177 L.Ed.2d 326
Andrew Ramey ELLMAKER, petitioner,
v.
KANSAS.
No. 09–9480.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 14, 2010.
Opinion
130 S.Ct. 3411
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
48 practice notes
-
State v. Warrior, 101
...v. McCaslin, 291 Kan. 697, 729-30, 245 P.3d 1030 (2011); State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, Syl. ¶ 11, 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied 130 S. Ct. 3410 (2010); State v. Martinez, 288 Kan. 443, 451, 204 P.3d 601 (2009); State v. Conley, 287 Kan. 696, 700-01, 197 P.3d 837 (2008); State v. Wa......
-
State v. Dunn, 106,586
...cannot be created by waiver, estoppel, or consent. See [State v. ] Ellmaker , 289 Kan. [1132,] 1151, [221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied 560 U.S. 966, 130 S.Ct. 3410, 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010) ]. Likewise, the constraint on raising the jurisdictional issue for the first time on appeal is incon......
-
State v. Williams, 102,615.
...290 Kan. 906, 925, 235 P.3d 460 (2010); State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 1145, 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3410, 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010). Often then, while still discussing the standard of review, we will explain that “ ‘[j]ury instructions are clearly erroneo......
-
State v. Tapia, 100,596.
...an error, if one occurred. [Citation omitted.]” State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 1139, 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3410, 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010). In Ellmaker, the defendant objected to an instruction on one ground but asserted a different argument on appeal. U......
Request a trial to view additional results
48 cases
-
State v. Warrior, 101
...v. McCaslin, 291 Kan. 697, 729-30, 245 P.3d 1030 (2011); State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, Syl. ¶ 11, 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied 130 S. Ct. 3410 (2010); State v. Martinez, 288 Kan. 443, 451, 204 P.3d 601 (2009); State v. Conley, 287 Kan. 696, 700-01, 197 P.3d 837 (2008); State v. Wa......
-
State v. Dunn, 106,586
...cannot be created by waiver, estoppel, or consent. See [State v. ] Ellmaker , 289 Kan. [1132,] 1151, [221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied 560 U.S. 966, 130 S.Ct. 3410, 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010) ]. Likewise, the constraint on raising the jurisdictional issue for the first time on appeal is incon......
-
State v. Williams, 102,615.
...290 Kan. 906, 925, 235 P.3d 460 (2010); State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 1145, 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3410, 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010). Often then, while still discussing the standard of review, we will explain that “ ‘[j]ury instructions are clearly erroneo......
-
State v. Tapia, 100,596.
...an error, if one occurred. [Citation omitted.]” State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 1139, 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3410, 177 L.Ed.2d 326 (2010). In Ellmaker, the defendant objected to an instruction on one ground but asserted a different argument on appeal. U......
Request a trial to view additional results