Ells v. Rector

Citation32 Mich. 379
CourtSupreme Court of Michigan
Decision Date08 October 1875
PartiesJonathan Ells v. Louisa Rector

Heard October 8, 1875

Error to Berrien Circuit.

Case remanded for a new trial.

Edward Bacon, for plaintiff in error.

George S. Clapp, for defendant in error.

OPINION

Graves, Ch. J.:

The writ of error here is brought to reverse a judgment given in the circuit court upon findings by the court where the cause was tried without a jury.

Upon examination of the record it appears that the findings were made and filed after the judge had resigned, and that one of the grounds of error is, that the judgment is not supported by the facts. This ground of objection is plainly fatal, there being no facts at all to support the judgment, and consequently a reversal is unavoidable.

As it appears, however, that the plaintiff in error has by his practice founded objections upon the findings, and in some respects proceeded as though the findings were not void, we think no costs should be given to either party as against the other, and that the case should be remanded for a new trial.

The other justices concurred.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • State ex rel. Harp v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Indiana
    • April 14, 1949
    ...... N.Y., 331; Putnam v. Crombie, [1861], 34 Barb., N.Y., 232;. Cain v. Libby, [1884], 32 Minn. 491, 21 N.W. 739;. Ells v. Rector, [1875], 32 Mich. 379; 23 Cyc. 565.' Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co., 1912,. 176 Ind. 682, 698, 699, 97 N.E. 8, 14. To permit a ......
  • Crane v. First Nat. Bank of McHenry
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Dakota
    • November 21, 1913
    ...jury written findings are requested, a judgment entered up before the findings are finally completed and filed is premature.” See Ells v. Rector, 32 Mich. 379. To the same effect see Sturdevant v. Stanton, 47 Conn. 579. And in 23 Cyc. 776b: “It is essential to follow closely the directions ......
  • State ex rel. Harp v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court, 28530.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Indiana
    • April 14, 1949
    ...N.Y., 331; Putnam v. Crombie, [1861], 34 Barb., N.Y., 232; Cain v. Libby, [1884], 32 Minn. 491, 21 N.W. 739;Ells v. Rector, [1875], 32 Mich. 379; 23 Cyc. 565.’ Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co., 1912, 176 Ind. 682, 698, 699, 97 N.E. 8, 14. To permit a succeeding judge to vacate and annu......
  • Wainwright v. P.H.&F.M. Roots Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Indiana
    • January 9, 1912
    ...Broadway Bank, 59 How. Prac. (N. Y.) 331;Putman v. Crombie, 34 Barb. (N. Y.) 232;Cain v. Libby, 32 Minn. 491, 21 N. W. 739;Ells v. Rector, 32 Mich. 379; 23 Cyc. 565. The consideration of the case by Judge Morris never having reached the point of determination of the issues, the action of Ju......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT