Emerick v. Emerick

Decision Date18 October 2017
CitationEmerick v. Emerick, 327 Conn. 922, 171 A.3d 60(Mem) (Conn. 2017)
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
Parties Denise EMERICK v. Roger EMERICK

Roger Emerick, self-represented, in support of the petition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 170 Conn.App. 368, 154 A.3d 1069(2017), is denied.

ROGERS, C.J., and McDONALD and ROBINSON, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Kent v. DiPaola
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • December 5, 2017
    ..., 326 Conn. 81, 121–22, 161 A.3d 1236 (2017) ; Emerick v. Emerick , 170 Conn. App. 368, 378, 154 A.3d 1069, cert. denied, 327 Conn. 922, 171 A.3d 60 (2017). With these principles in mind, we now turn to the specific claims of the plaintiff.IThe plaintiff first claims that the court erred wi......
  • Boreen v. Boreen
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • September 3, 2019
    ...as it did." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Emerick v. Emerick , 170 Conn. App. 368, 378, 154 A.3d 1069, cert. denied, 327 Conn. 922, 171 A.3d 60 (2017).AThe plaintiff first argues that the court erred in finding that she was living with Rodriguez within the meaning of § 46b-86 (b) beca......
  • Dolan v. Dolan
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • June 7, 2022
    ...as it did." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Emerick v. Emerick , 170 Conn. App. 368, 378, 154 A.3d 1069, cert. denied, 327 Conn. 922, 171 A.3d 60 (2017). In the present case, the plaintiff argues that the court abused its discretion when it modified the definition of "pre-tax compensati......
  • Wilson v. Di Iulio
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • August 27, 2019
    ...omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Emerick v. Emerick , 170 Conn. App. 368, 379–80, 154 A.3d 1069, cert. denied, 327 Conn. 922, 171 A.3d 60 (2017). "There is no absolute right to alimony." Weinstein v. Weinstein , 18 Conn. App. 622, 637, 561 A.2d 443 (1989).At trial, the defendant ......
  • Get Started for Free