Emerson v. Boyd
| Decision Date | 14 February 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-346,90-346 |
| Citation | 805 P.2d 587,247 Mont. 241 |
| Parties | Robert C. EMERSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Terry L. BOYD, d/b/a Boyd Brothers Trucking, Defendant and Respondent. |
| Court | Montana Supreme Court |
Robert G. Olson, Frisbee, Moore, Stufft & Olson, Cut Bank, for plaintiff and appellant.
Mary L. Zemyan, Wolf Point, for defendant and respondent.
Robert C. Emerson, plaintiff, sued Terry L. Boyd, defendant, for breach of contract in the District Court for the Fifteenth Judicial District, Roosevelt County. Plaintiff secured a default judgment against defendant for $12,849.04, plus costs of $99.90. Plaintiff levied execution upon defendant's bank account. Upon motion the District Court concluded that the civil jurisdiction of the case had been preempted by the Tribe's exercise of jurisdiction. The District Court vacated the default judgment and directed the return to the defendant of any monies collected through execution. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
The issue is whether the Montana District Court may assume jurisdiction in this contract claim.
The initial question is whether the action arose on the Indian reservation. In determining the location of a contract dispute, we hereby adopt the following language of the Ninth Circuit in R.J. Williams Co. v. Fort Belknap Housing Auth. (9th Cir.1983), 719 F.2d 979:
Generally courts look to (1) the place of contracting, (2) the place of negotiation of the contract, (3) the place of performance, (4) the location of the subject matter of the contract, and (5) the place of residence of the parties, evaluating each factor according to its relative importance with respect to the dispute. Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws Sec. 188(2) (1971).
Both plaintiff and defendant are members of the Fort Peck Tribes, with the defendant residing on reservation, and the plaintiff residing off reservation. Contract negotiations took place over the telephone with defendant located on reservation and plaintiff off reservation. The written contract between the parties was signed on the reservation. The dispatching activities of the trucking company were conducted by the defendant on the reservation. Payments were mailed to a bank off the reservation. Nearly all loads were picked up at points or delivered to points out of state or in Montana outside the exterior boundaries of the reservation. We conclude the activities occurring on the reservation are sufficiently substantial to establish that the contract dispute arose on the reservation.
Before a Montana District Court can...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Suthers v. Cash Ad. and Pref.
...(3) performance is to occur; (4) the subject matter of the contract is located; and (5) the parties reside. Emerson v. Boyd, 247 Mont. 241, 242-43, 805 P.2d 587, 588 (1991); see Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. Walker Adjustment Bureau, 198 Colo. 444, 447-48, 601 P.2d 1369, 1372-73 (1979) (adoptin......
-
In the Matter of The EState F. Big Spring v. Conway
...398; Krause v. Neuman, 284 Mont. 399, 943 P.2d 1328 (1997); Lambert v. Ryozik, 268 Mont. 219, 886 P.2d 378 (1994); Emerson v. Boyd, 247 Mont. 241, 805 P.2d 587 (1991); Geiger v. Pierce, 233 Mont. 18, 758 P.2d 279 (1988); Milbank Mut. Ins. Co. v. Eagleman, 218 Mont. 58, 705 P.2d 1117 (1985);......
-
Comanche Nation of Okla. v. Coffey
...(3) performance is to occur; (4) the subject matter of the contract is located; and (5) the parties reside. Emerson v. Boyd, 247 Mont. 241, 242-43, 805 P.2d 587, 588 (1991) ; see WoodBros. Homes, Inc. v. WalkerAdjustmentBureau, 198 Colo. 444, 447-48, 601 P.2d 1369, 1372-73 (1979) (adopting ......
-
Casarotto v. Lombardi
...or Montana law involves a conflict of law issue and that the answer can be found in our prior decisions. We agree. In Emerson v. Boyd (1991), 247 Mont. 241, 805 P.2d 587, we cited with approval the Ninth Circuit's decision in R.J. Williams Co. v. Fort Belknap Housing Authority (9th Cir.1983......