Eminente v. Johnson, 19802.

Decision Date03 May 1966
Docket NumberNo. 19802.,19802.
Citation361 F.2d 73
PartiesEmilio EMINENTE, Appellant, v. Lyndon Baines JOHNSON et al., Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

Mr. George T. Altman, Beverly Hills, Cal., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Miss Lola Boswell, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Richard S. Salzman, Attorney, Department of Justice, for appellees. Asst. Atty. Gen. John W. Douglas, Messrs. David G. Bress, U. S. Atty., and Morton Hollander, Attorney, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees.

Before FAHY, BURGER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is from dismissal of an action for damages and related injunctive relief, filed in the District Court by a non-resident alien against the United States without its consent with respect to a non-justiciable issue, namely, damage to property in a foreign country said to have been caused by the armed forces of the United States acting under authority of the Government of the United States.

The order of the District Court dismissing the complaint accordingly is

Affirmed.

BURGER, Circuit Judge (concurring).

Apart from other considerations, our recent holdings in Pauling v. McNamara, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 50, 331 F.2d 796 (1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 933, 84 S.Ct. 1336, 12 L.Ed.2d 297 (1964), and Pauling v. McElroy, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 372, 278 F.2d 252, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835, 81 S.Ct. 61, 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960), are dispositive of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Powell v. McCormack
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • July 30, 1968
    ...e. g., Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 68 S.Ct. 431, 92 L.Ed. 568 (1948); Eminente v. Johnson, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 56, 361 F.2d 73, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 929, 87 S.Ct. 287, 17 L.Ed.2d 211 (1966); Pauling v. McNamara, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 50, 331 F.2d 796 ......
  • Sanchez-Espinoza v. Reagan
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • August 13, 1985
    ...that their resolution would require the court to address a nonjusticiable political question, citing our decision in Eminente v. Johnson, 361 F.2d 73 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 929, 87 S.Ct. 287, 17 L.Ed.2d 211 (1966). It dismissed the claims of the congressional appellants on the a......
  • Sanchez-Espinoza v. Reagan
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • August 1, 1983
    ...resolution of this matter is not proper at this time because it involves a nonjusticiable political question. See also Eminente v. Johnson, 361 F.2d 73 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 929, 87 S.Ct. 287, 17 L.Ed.2d 211 (1966) (non-resident alien's damage claims against President Johnson d......
  • Luftig v. McNamara
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • February 6, 1967
    ...Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 111, 68 S.Ct. 431, 92 L.Ed. 568 (1948); Eminente v. Johnson, 124 U.S. App.D.C. 56, 361 F.2d 73, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 929, 87 S.Ct. 287, 17 L.Ed.2d 211 (1966); Pauling v. McNamara, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 50, 331 F.2d 796 (......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT