Emite v. United States
Decision Date | 18 November 1926 |
Docket Number | No. 4784.,4784. |
Parties | EMITE et al. v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Thos. F. Whiteside, Jr., of Dallas, Tex. (John R. Palmer, of Galveston, Tex., on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.
H. M. Holden, U. S. Atty., of Houston, Tex.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
The plaintiffs in error were convicted on two counts of an information charging them with unlawfully possessing and unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor fit and intended for beverage purposes. Over their objection the court permitted a federal prohibition enforcement officer to testify as to the witness and another federal prohibition enforcement officer arresting the accused and finding 51 gallons of intoxicating liquor in an automobile in which they were traveling on a public highway after dark. The witness testified to the following effect:
The testimony of the witness, not only did not show that, before the search was made, the officers had probable cause to believe that an offense had been committed, but indicated the absence of such probable cause. Probable cause did not exist, unless the facts and circumstances within...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Alaniz
...no cases upon the exact point, although there is language in the case of United States v. Allen (D.C.) 16 F.2d 320, and Emite v. United States, 5 Cir., 15 F.2d 623, which would indicate that such an element might enter into the consideration of the court in the determination of whether or n......
-
People v. Hill
...this was not evident or discernible from what could then be seen or known. Moring v. United States, 5 Cir., 40 F.2d 267; Emite v. United States, 5 Cir., 15 F.2d 623. 'Nothing discernible to the senses taught reasonably that crime was then being done until the Agent saw, and demanded, the lo......
-
Clay v. United States
...this was not evident or discernible from what could then be seen or known. Moring v. United States, 5 Cir., 40 F.2d 267; Emite v. United States, 5 Cir., 15 F.2d 623. Nothing discernible to the senses taught reasonably that crime was then being done until the Agent saw, and demanded, the lot......
-
Ward v. United States, 8644.
...if such contention were made, it would be unavailing, for the case is ruled by Ray v. United States, 5 Cir., 84 F.2d 654; Emite v. United States, 5 Cir., 15 F.2d 623; Moring v. United States, 5 Cir., 40 F.2d The search and seizure made by Stewart was justified below; it is defended here, on......