Emp'rs Mut. Cas. Co. v. Kenny Hayes Custom Homes, LLC.
Decision Date | 09 February 2016 |
Docket Number | Civil Action No. 15-0054-CG-B |
Parties | EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KENNY HAYES CUSTOM HOMES, LLC., KENNY HAYES, individually, DAVID CHANCELLOR, individually, JOE NELSON, individually, TAMMY NELSON, individually. Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Alabama |
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 47), Defendants' responses in opposition (Docs. 49, 50), and Plaintiff's replies (Docs. 51, 52). For the reasons explained below, the Court finds that Plaintiff has not shown as a matter of law that it is entitled to a declaration that it does not owe a duty to defend or indemnify Kenny Hayes Custom Homes, LLC, Kenny Hayes and/or David Chancellor in the underlying state court action. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment will be denied.
The underpinnings of this insurance coverage declaratory judgment action liein a breach of contract and tort claim lawsuit filed on May 19, 2014, in the Circuit Court of Wilcox County, Alabama, Docket No. 14-900046 (the "underlying action"). (Doc.47-2). In the underlying action, Joe and Tammy Nelson sued Kenny Hayes Custom Homes, LLC, Kenny Hayes and/or David Chancellor (referred collectively herein as "Kenny Hayes Homes" or "builder") for breach of contract, negligence, wantonness or willfulness, negligent hiring or supervision, fraud, breach of warranty and deceptive trade practices arising from the construction of the Nelsons' home. (Doc. 47-2). According to the complaint in the underlying action, the Nelsons entered into a contract on March 6, 2012 for the construction of their home by Kenny Hayes Homes. (Doc.47-2, ¶ 18). Throughout the construction process and subsequent to completion, the Nelsons allege numerous failures of Kenny Hayes Homes to adequately supervise the construction causing the Nelsons to suffer "extreme mental anguish and emotional distress" and resulting in increased costs of construction and serious latent defects with the home, including water intrusion. (Doc. 47-2). Regarding the alleged water intrusion, the Nelsons testified that when water would come in they would mop it up with towels and sometimes leave buckets to catch the water. (Doc. 47-7, p. 7; Doc. 47-8, p. 5). Some of the walls hare stained from water, "where the water poured down and just stripped all the stain and everything off." (Doc. 47-7, p. 7; Doc. 47-8, p. 5). The Nelsons also contend that the exterior walls are damaged because of the water pouring in, but no one has told them it is damaged. (Doc. 47-8, p. 6). The Nelsons did not assert any claims for damage to any furniture, rugs or other personal property. (Doc. 47-8, p. 6). Mr.Nelson reports experiencing mental anguish because of having leaks every time it rains, but Mr. Nelson has not gone to a doctor for the mental anguish. (Doc. 47-7, p. 7). Mrs. Nelson also reports suffering mental anguish and testified that she went to a doctor and was prescribed medicine to help her nerves. (Doc. 47-8, p. 7). Their mental anguish also results from their breach of contract claim and began for Mrs. Nelson when they had to go borrow money and they could not get money to finish the house. (Doc. 47-7, p. 8, Doc. 47-8, p. 7). In November 2012, the Nelsons and Kenny Hayes Homes mutually agreed to end the construction contract and release each other from the obligations under the contract. (Doc. 50-6, pp. 6, 7-8).
Employers Mutual Casualty Company ("EMCC") issued a commercial general liability insurance policy (Doc. 47-3) to Kenny Hayes Homes and has been providing a defense to Kenny Hayes Homes in the underlying action pursuant to a strict reservation of rights. EMCC filed the current action in this Court on February 2, 2015 seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Kenny Hayes Homes in the underlying action. (Doc. 1).
The insurance policy provides coverage for "sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages because of 'bodily injury' or 'property damage.' " (Doc. 47-3, p. 25). The policy specifies that it applies to bodily injury and property damage only if:
(Doc. 47-3, p. 25). The policy defines "bodily injury" as "bodily injury, sickness or disease sustained by a person, including death resulting form any of these at any time." (Doc. 47-3, p. 37). "Property damage" is defined as:
(Doc. 47-3, p. 39). "Occurrence" is defined as "an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful conditions." (Doc. 47-3, p. 38).
The policy contains several exclusions that EMCC contends apply: contractual liability exclusion, damage to property exclusion, damage to impaired property or property not physically injured exclusion, professional liability exclusion and the absolute exclusion for fraud, misrepresentation, deceit or suppression or concealment of fact.
Exclusion 2(b), "Contractual Liability" excludes the following:
Exclusion 2(j), "Damage to Property" excludes the following:
(Doc. 47-3, p. 39). "Products-completed operations hazard" does not include "bodily injury" or "property damage" arising out of:
Exclusion 2(m), "Damage To Impaired Property Or...
To continue reading
Request your trial