Empire Outdoor Advertising Co. v. New York State Thruway Authority
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Citation | Empire Outdoor Advertising Co. v. New York State Thruway Authority, 267 N.Y.S.2d 315, 25 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966) |
| Decision Date | 13 January 1966 |
| Parties | EMPIRE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY, Respondent. |
Nusbaum, Tarricone, Bilgore, Weltman & Silver, Rochester, for appellant (Carl C. Tarricone, Rochester, of counsel).
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., Albany, for respondent (Julius L. Sackman, Albany, of counsel).
Order unanimously affirmed without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from Order of Court of Claims, Bodine, J., granting defendant's motion to dismiss the claim for failure...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1 cases
-
Whitmier & Ferris Co. v. State
...York State Thruway Auth. v. Ashley Motor Ct., 10 N.Y.2d 151, 218 N.Y.S.2d 640, 176 N.E.2d 566, and Empire Outdoor Adv. Co. v. New York State Thruway Auth., 25 A.D.2d 498, 267 N.Y.S.2d 315, app. dismd. 17 N.Y.2d 730. The claim has thus been dismissed upon its merits without regard to its dat......