Employment Sec. Com'n of Wyoming v. Laramie Cabs, Inc.
Decision Date | 31 May 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 84-71,84-71 |
Citation | 700 P.2d 399 |
Parties | EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF WYOMING, Appellant (Defendant-Respondent), v. LARAMIE CABS, INC., Appellee (Plaintiff-Petitioner). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Carl J. Hildebrand, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Employment Sec. Com'n of Wyoming, Casper, for appellant (defendant-respondent).
No appearance for appellee (plaintiff-petitioner).
Before THOMAS *, C.J., and ROSE, ROONEY **, BROWN and CARDINE, JJ.
The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether the taxicab drivers who lease cabs from appellee Laramie Cabs, Inc. in exchange for a percentage of the fares are employees under the terms of the Wyoming Employment Security Law, §§ 27-3-101 through 27-3-704, W.S.1977. Appellant Employment Security Commission of Wyoming classified these workers as employees and required appellee to contribute to the unemployment compensation fund on their behalf. The district court overturned the agency's action on the ground that Laramie Cabs lacked sufficient control over the drivers, either in fact or under the lease agreement, for the drivers to qualify as employees under the employment security law.
While we agree with the district court's determination that the drivers performed their services outside the control of Laramie Cabs, that finding alone does not determine the workers' employment status under the law. We will hold that Laramie Cabs failed to carry its burden of establishing that the taxicab drivers were not in its employment, as that term is defined in § 27-3-104(b), W.S.1977, of the employment security law. We will, therefore, reverse the decision of the district court and reinstate the final action of the Employment Security Commission of Wyoming, which requires appellee to contribute to the unemployment compensation fund according to the wages earned by the taxicab drivers.
In the summer of 1982, Robert Sullivan, president of Laramie Cabs, Inc., notified the Employment Security Commission of Wyoming (ESC or Commission) that he considered his taxicab drivers to be independent contractors and that he wished to discontinue payments on their earnings to the unemployment compensation fund. Sullivan prepared a lease agreement under which Laramie Cabs would lease its vehicles to licensed taxicab operators, who would enjoy "complete discretion" in performing the duties generally associated with the taxicab business.
The field auditor and the contributions audit section of ESC determined that the leasing arrangement did not suffice to alter the status of the drivers as employees under the employment security law. Laramie Cabs appealed that decision to the Commission and requested a hearing pursuant to § 27-3-502, W.S.1977. 1 Prior to the hearing, Laramie Cabs began operating under the lease agreements. Accordingly, by the time of the employer liability hearing on March 1, 1983, appellee was able to present evidence of the actual working conditions under the new lease agreements.
The Taxicab Lease Agreement provides for Laramie Cabs to lease its radio-equipped vehicles to licensed operators and to maintain the cabs and equipment in good
working condition. Laramie Cabs further agrees to furnish all gas, oil, antifreeze, and tires, to maintain liability insurance, and to assume responsibility for all licenses, taxes and fees for each vehicle. Paragraph 2 obligates the company to notify the drivers by radio or telephone of potential passengers:
In exchange for these services, supplies and equipment, the lessees-drivers agree to pay Laramie Cabs 60 percent of the fares collected each day and to abide by the company's rate schedule. The drivers further agree to operate the leased cabs reasonably, courteously, and lawfully and to test the equipment each day:
The lease agreement may be canceled by either party upon written notice:
Finally, the agreement purports to establish the drivers as independent contractors, ineligible for unemployment benefits:
Laramie Cabs, the only taxicab service based in Laramie, holds a city license to Laramie Cabs obtains almost all of its business from patrons who contact the company by telephone. The dispatcher notifies the nearest driver, who can refuse to take the fare if he chooses. When that occurs, another driver, Sullivan or his wife transports the customer. Sullivan testified that each driver sets the days and hours which he wishes to work. The drivers enjoy some personal use of the leased vehicles, but must return the cabs to a central location when they are not available to drive for an extended period of time. Each driver pays his own fines for traffic violations as well as the liability-insurance surcharges which result from such violations.
provide intracity transportation and a permit from the Wyoming Public Service Commission to operate within the state. Sullivan, the company president, testified that he maintains a list of persons who have been licensed by the City of Laramie to drive taxicabs. When a cab becomes available for lease, the company enters into an agreement with one of these eligible drivers.
Laramie Cabs presented evidence to establish that other governmental agencies, including the United States Department of Labor and the Internal Revenue Service, have recognized taxicab drivers as independent contractors under the type of lease agreement at issue here. Sullivan testified that the Wyoming Workmen's Compensation Division reviewed the company's lease agreement and concluded that the cab drivers were not employees for purposes of the Worker's Compensation Act. Finally, appellee introduced a summary of the results of a national survey of taxicab company operators, prepared by the University of North Carolina, which indicates that in 1982 58 percent of taxicab drivers were independent contractors.
Based on the foregoing evidence presented by appellee at the administrative hearing, ESC determined that the taxicab drivers were employees under the employment security law:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Standard Oil of Conn., Inc. v. Adm'r, Unemployment Comp. Act
...Recovery, Inc. v. Job Service of North Dakota, 475 N.W.2d 918, 924 (N.D.1991); and a taxicab business;7 Employment Security Commission v. Laramie Cabs, Inc., 700 P.2d 399, 407 (Wyo.1985); hotel meeting rooms, for a real estate association providing continuing education to its members; Misso......
-
Yellow Cab Cooperative, Inc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
...(Tenn.1977) 558 S.W.2d 436; Department of Labor v. Tacoma Yellow Cab Co. (1982) 31 Wash.App. 117, 639 P.2d 843; Employment Sec. Comm'n v. Laramie Cabs (Wyo.1985) 700 P.2d 399.)Another court has reached the same result on a narrower ground. (See Worrell v. Yellow Cab Co. (1978) 146 Ga.App. 7......
-
Nelson v. Yellow Cab Co.
...social security purposes. See Salt Lake Transp. Co. v. Board of Review, 5 Utah 2d 87, 296 P.2d 983 (1956); Employment Sec. Comm'n of Wyoming v. Laramie, 700 P.2d 399 (Wyo. 1985). 3. As noted by Yellow Cab, North Carolina has held cab drivers are not employees but independent contractors. Al......
-
Standard Oil of Conn., Inc. v. Adm'r
...Inc. v. Job Service of North Dakota, 475 N.W.2d 918, 924 (N.D. 1991); and a taxicab business;7 Employment Security Commission v. Laramie Cabs, Inc., 700 P.2d 399, 407 (Wyo. 1985); hotel meeting rooms, for a real estate association providing continuing education to its members; Missouri Assn......