Enayati v. Lufthansa German Airlines

Decision Date22 August 1983
Docket NumberNo. 81-6028,81-6028
Citation714 F.2d 75
PartiesNadjatollah ENAYATI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Kathryn R. DeVincenzi, Graham & James, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Bernard Lindner, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before SNEED and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and CORDOVA *, District Judge.

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

Enayati, an Iranian citizen, appeals the district court's decision dismissing his complaint for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Enayati seeks damages for injury to goods transported by Lufthansa German Airlines from Tehran to Los Angeles. He argues, inter alia, that the district court has jurisdiction over his action because the Warsaw Convention creates an implied cause of action for injury to personal property. In light of this court's recent decision in In re Mexico City Aircrash of October 31, 1979, 708 F.2d 400 (9th Cir.1983), the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

In Mexico City Aircrash this court held that Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention "creates an independent cause of action for wrongful death, a cause of action founded in federal treaty law." Id. at 412. We find no principled distinction in this regard between an action for damage to personal property and a wrongful death action. The language of Article 17 is very similar to that of Article 18, which governs damage to baggage and goods. Moreover, the court in Mexico City Aircrash relied on Benjamins v. British European Airways, 572 F.2d 913, 918 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1114, 99 S.Ct. 1016, 59 L.Ed.2d 72 (1979), which held that both Articles 17 and 18 create federal causes of action.

Because we find that Enayati's action arises under a treaty of the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, we need not reach his other jurisdictional contentions.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

* Hon. Valdemar A. Cordova, United States District Judge for the district of Arizona, sitting by designation.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • In re Air Crash Disaster at Gander, Newfoundland
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Kentucky
    • April 20, 1987
    ...had held a right to recover for damage to property under Article 18 existed without any enacting statute. See Enayati v. Lufthansa German Airlines, 714 F.2d 75 (9th Cir.1983); Benjamins v. British European Airways, 572 F.2d 913 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1114, 99 S.Ct. 1016, 59 L......
  • Dorizas v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, 84 C 5911.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • November 21, 1984
    ...72 (1979), followed in In re Mexico City Aircrash of October 31, 1979, 708 F.2d 400, 409-16 (9th Cir.1983) and Enayati v. Lufthansa German Airlines, 714 F.2d 75 (9th Cir.1983); Seth v. BOAC, 329 F.2d 302, 305 (1st Cir.1964). K.L.M. contends the older law in the Second Circuit and elsewhere,......
  • Sanchez-Sanchez v. I.N.S., SANCHEZ-SANCHE
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • July 11, 1994
  • Stud v. Trans Intern. Airlines, 83-1543
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • March 8, 1984
    ...existence of a federal question under the version of the Warsaw Convention in force in the United States, see Enayati v. Lufthansa German Airlines, 714 F.2d 75, 76 (9th Cir.1983), but on diversity of citizenship as well, 3 we are not compelled to apply the United States version of the Conve......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT