Endicott v. De Barbieri
Decision Date | 03 March 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 42460,42460 |
Citation | 369 P.2d 241,189 Kan. 301 |
Parties | Jeannette H. ENDICOTT et al., Appellees, v. Louis V. DE BARBIERI et al., Appellants. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. Where an oil and gas lease contains certain clear and concise covenants as to lessee's duty to drill, they will be enforced without regard to standards of prudent leasehold operation under implied covenants.
2. The parties have the right to make their own lawful contract, and to have such contract enforced as written.
James W. Sargent, Wichita, argued the cause, and Emmet A. Blaes, Roetzel Jochems, Robert G. Braden, J. Francis Hesse, Stanley E. Wisdom, Cecil E. Merkel, Harry L. Hobson, Bruce W. Zuercher, Terrance J. Muth, and Lawrence D. Klenda J. Richards Hunter, Hutchinson, argued the cause, and D. C. Martindell, W. D. P. Carey, Harry H. Dunn, Edwin B. Brabets, Robert C. Martindell, William B. Swearer, Elwin F. Cabbage and John W. Feist, Hutchinson, were with him on the briefs, for appellees.
Wichita, and Paul R. Wunsch and Charles H. Stewart, Kingman, were him on the briefs, for appellants.
The plaintiffs-appellees filed the suit in the court below for the purpose of obtaining a decree holding a certain oil and gas lease upon a quarter section of land in Kingman county null and void and to have expired under the special terms of the lease. After pleadings had been filed, the parties entered into a written stipulation of facts upon which the court heard the case and decided in favor of the plaintiffs allowing them the relief prayed for in the petition.
We shall set forth in stipulation of facts upon which the case was tried.
'In lieu of the submission of evidence the parties hereto agreed that the action should be determined upon pleadings filed herein and the following stipulation:
To continue reading
Request your trial- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Pruitt
-
Thomas Well Service, Inc. v. Williams Natural Gas
...P.2d 438 (quoting Adams v. John Deere Co., 13 Kan.App.2d 489, 492, 774 P.2d 355 (1989)), rev. denied, 246 Kan. 766 (1990); see Endicott v. DeBarbieri, 189 Kan. 301, Syl. ¶ 2, 369 P.2d 241 (1962) ("Parties have the right to make their own lawful contract, and to have such contract enforced a......
-
Razorback Contractors v. Board Cty. Com'Rs
...is clear and unambiguous, the parties to a lawful contract are entitled to have it enforced as written. See Endicott v. DeBarbieri, 189 Kan. 301, 304, 369 P.2d 241 (1962). `Parties are free to contract for any type of . . . notice they desire,' and when a type of notice is specified, `the p......
-
Morgan v. Mobil Oil Corp., s. 83-1263
...result. Martin v. Edwards, 219 Kan. 466, 548 P.2d 779 (1976); Cline v. Angle, 216 Kan. 328, 532 P.2d 1093 (1975); Endicott v. DeBarbieri, 189 Kan. 301, 369 P.2d 241 (1962). In addition to considering the Kansas rules for contract interpretation we must consider also the basic legal principl......