Engel by Engel v. Lichterman
Decision Date | 29 June 1984 |
Citation | 479 N.Y.S.2d 188,62 N.Y.2d 943 |
Parties | , 468 N.E.2d 26 Jordan ENGEL, an Infant, by Sharon ENGEL, his Mother and Natural Guardian, et al., Appellants, v. Jacob J. LICHTERMAN, Respondent. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 95 A.D.2d 536, 467 N.Y.S.2d 642 (1983), should be affirmed, with costs.
According to an affidavit of service by mail submitted by defendant, a copy of a conditional order of preclusion with notice of entry was placed, postpaid, in an official depository of the United States on December 12, 1979. Plaintiffs never complied with the order, and defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the action in March 1981. Plaintiffs opposed by claiming that the conditional order had never been received. Specifically, plaintiffs' attorney averred that it "appears" that the order was mailed, but his office "never received that order," from which he could "only surmise that this document was lost in the mail, since it was never delivered to our offices."
A properly executed affidavit of service raises a presumption that a proper mailing occurred. By statute, service is complete upon mailing (CPLR 2103, subd. par. 2). Plaintiffs' papers raise no question of fact as to whether proper service was made.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Citibank, N.A. v. Conti-Scheurer
...receipt is insufficient to rebut a presumption of mailing where there is documentary proof of the mailing (see Engel v. Lichterman, 62 N.Y.2d 943, 479 N.Y.S.2d 188, 468 N.E.2d 26 ; Flushing Sav. Bank, FSB v. Colmar Realty, LLC, 121 A.D.3d 1040, 1041, 994 N.Y.S.2d 311 ). Indeed, this Court h......
-
CIT Bank N.A. v. Schiffman
...document was sent through evidence of actual mailing (e.g., an affidavit of mailing or service) (see Engel v. Lichterman, 62 N.Y.2d 943, 944, 479 N.Y.S.2d 188, 468 N.E.2d 26 [1984] ) or—as relevant here—by proof of a sender's routine business practice with respect to the creation, addressin......
-
Leon v. Murphy
...642, 647 (2d Dep't 1983) (mere denial of receipt does not raise a question of fact as to mailing), aff'd mem., 62 N.Y.2d 943, 479 N.Y.S.2d 188, 468 N.E.2d 26 (1984); cf. Vita v. Heller, 97 A.D.2d 464, 464, 467 N.Y.S.2d 652, 653 (2d Dep't 1983) (per curiam) (affidavit of secretary that recor......
-
Reverse Mortg. Solutions, Inc. v. Lawrence
...that he lacked notice ( Cavalry Portfolio Servs., LLC v. Reisman, 55 A.D.3d 524, 525, 865 N.Y.S.2d 286 [2008] ; see Engel v. Lichterman, 62 N.Y.2d 943, 944–945, 479 N.Y.S.2d 188, 468 N.E.2d 26 [1984] ; C & H Import & Export, Inc. v. MNA Global, Inc., 79 A.D.3d 784, 785–786, 912 N.Y.S.2d 428......