Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration, L.L.C., Docket No. 147727.

Decision Date13 June 2014
Docket NumberCOA No. 305731.,Docket No. 147727.
Citation846 N.W.2d 928,496 Mich. 853
PartiesDanny EPPS and Joyce Epps, Plaintiffs–Appellees/Cross–Appellants, v. 4 QUARTERS RESTORATION, L.L.C., Denaglen Corp., d/b/a MBM Check Cashing, Emergency Insurance Services, and Troy Willis, Defendants–Appellants/Cross–Appellees, and AM Adjusting & Appraisals, L.L.C., Michael N. Anderson, Jr., Home Owners Insurance Company, Paula Mathews, Maximum Restoration, L.L.C., Auto Owners Insurance Company, Charles Willis, and Comerica Bank, Defendants.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 6, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application for leave to appeal or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the contracts and limited power of attorney at issue are void or merely voidable, and whether the plaintiffs are required to establish actual damages to recover on their breach of contract and fraud/misrepresentation claims. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants remains pending.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLC., Docket No. 147727.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Michigan
    • 28 Septiembre 2015
    ...whether to grant the application for leave to appeal or take other action pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1). Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration, LLC, 496 Mich. 853, 846 N.W.2d 928 (2014). After hearing arguments on March 10, 2015, defendants' application is now considered. This case raises four issue......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT