Epps v. Parrish
| Decision Date | 08 March 1921 |
| Docket Number | (No. 11759.) |
| Citation | 26 Ga.App. 399,106 S.E. 297 |
| Parties | EPPS. v. PARRISH. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)
Error from City Court of Savannah; Davis Freeman, Judge.
Action by Mrs. E. A. Parrish against Mrs. J. D. Epps. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed.
Hitch & Denmark, of Savannah, for plaintiff in error.
Oliver & Oliver, of Savannah, for defendant in error.
This case arises by reason of a suit to recover damages, wherein it is alleged that the plaintiff was riding as an invited guest, in an automobile owned and driven by the defendant; that while so riding as such invited guest, along with other members of her family, who were also invited guests, the defendant carelessly and negligently, and because of inexperience and lack of skill in the handling of an automobile, lost control of the automobile and drove it, head on, into a large oak tree, wrecking the automobile, and that by reason of the wreck, the plaintiff was injured. The defendant demurred to the petition, upon the ground that It set forth no cause of action. The court overruled the demurrer.
Held: Inasmuch as the plaintiff was an invited guest and a gratuitous passenger, and it not being alleged that the defendant was guilty of gross negligence, it was error for the court to overrule the general demurrer. It is our opinion that in order for an invited guest in an automobile to recover of the owner and driver of the car for an injury occasioned by the negligence of the driver, it must be pleaded that such negligence was gross negligence. See, in this connection, the reasoning set out in Self v. Dunn & Brown. 42 Ga. 528, 5 Am. Rep. 544. See, also, in this connection, Civil Code 1910, § 3473; Huddy on Automobiles (5th Ed.) 890; Massaletti v. Fitzroy, 228 Mass. 487, 118 N. E. 168, L. R. A. 1918C, 264, Ann. Cas. 1918B, 1088. We understand that it has been an open question in Georgia as to what degree of negligence is owed by the owner and driver of an automobile to an invited guest. We have reached the conclusion that in order for the invited guest to recover from the owner and operator of an automobile for an injury received by reason of the negligent driving or handling of the machine, there must be facts pleaded that show gross neglect upon the part of the owner and driver of the machine. We have examined cases from other states, and in all cases where there seems to be a holding to the contrary the cases were dependent...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Naphtali v. Lafazan
...v. Venzie, 263 Pa. 541, 107 A. 383; Boggs v. Plybon, 157 Va. 30, 160 S.E. 77; Jones v. Massie, 158 Va. 121, 163 S.E. 63; Epps v. Parrish, 26 Ga.App. 399, 106 S.E. 297). The Ohio statute does not define the word 'guest' as used therein (Lombardo v. De Shance, 167 Ohio St. 431, 434, 149 N.E.2......
-
Huffman v. Buckingham Transp. Co. of Colorado
...121 N.E. 505, 4 A.L.R. 1185; Massaletti v. Fitzroy, 228 Mass. 487, 118 N. E. 168, L.R.A.1918C, 264, Ann.Cas.1918B, 1088; Epps v. Parrish, 26 Ga.App. 399, 106 S.E. 297; Peavy v. Peavy, 36 Ga.App. 202, 136 S.E. 96, 97; Hall v. Slaton, 40 Ga.App. 288, 149 S.E. 306; Hennig v. Booth, 132 A. 294,......
-
Thomas v. Barnett
...as gross negligence is somewhat more difficult. It takes but a casual examination of the cases, beginning with Epps v. Parrish, 26 Ga.App. 399, 106 S.E. 297, which established the gross negligence rule in Georgia, to see that the trend of the appellate courts in Georgia has been decidedly a......
-
Bickford v. Nolen
...this case to decide whether Georgia will continue to follow the automobile guest passenger rule as it was established in Epps v. Parrish, 25 Ga.App. 399, 106 S.E. 297, and approved by this court in Holland v. Boyett, 212 Ga. 458(2), 93 S.E.2d The petitioner, Deborah Ann Bickford, was a gues......
-
Roberts v. Johnson-a Welcome Change Tainted
...(1926). 71. Georgia is the only remaining jurisdiction adhering to a common law requirement of gross negligence. See Epps v. Parrish, 26 Ga. App. 399,106 S.E. 297 (1921). The Georgia Court of Appeals, stating that its common law host-guest rule was an unconstitutional violation of both stat......